249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945302)
1. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI texture analysis in multiple sclerosis: toward a clinical analysis protocol.
Harrison LC; Raunio M; Holli KK; Luukkaala T; Savio S; Elovaara I; Soimakallio S; Eskola HJ; Dastidar P
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):696-707. PubMed ID: 20457414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Texture analysis for tissue discrimination on T1-weighted MR images of the knee joint in a multicenter study: Transferability of texture features and comparison of feature selection methods and classifiers.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher MJ; Kramer J; Aigner N; Hofmann S; Materka A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 16215966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher M; Amann G; Dominkus M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18448302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images.
Juntu J; Sijbers J; De Backer S; Rajan J; Van Dyck D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):680-9. PubMed ID: 20187212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion weighted MR imaging of the breast.
Abdel Razek AA; Gaballa G; Denewer A; Tawakol I
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 20004597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast.
Kurz KD; Steinhaus D; Klar V; Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Saleh A; Mödder U; Blondin D
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI.
Madabhushi A; Feldman MD; Metaxas DN; Tomaszeweski J; Chute D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1611-25. PubMed ID: 16350920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions?
Ballesio L; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Porfiri LM; D'Ambrosio I; Maggi C; Castro ED; Bennati P; Fanelli GP; Vestri AR; Manganaro L
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18479866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated computer differential classification in Parkinsonian Syndromes via pattern analysis on MRI.
Duchesne S; Rolland Y; Vérin M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 19064213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A wavelet-based optimal texture feature set for classification of brain tumours.
Sasikala M; Kumaravel N
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 18432467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
