507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945485)
41. Performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: A comparison between US and Israeli cohorts.
Yi JJ; Weinberger R; Moore TM; Calkins ME; Guri Y; McDonald-McGinn DM; Zackai EH; Emanuel BS; Gur RE; Gothelf D; Gur RC
Brain Cogn; 2016 Jul; 106():33-41. PubMed ID: 27200494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.
Rolle CE; Anguera JA; Skinner SN; Voytek B; Gazzaley A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1483-1497. PubMed ID: 28654361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Lack of general learning ability factor in a rat test battery measuring a wide spectrum of cognitive domains.
Kassai F; Ernyey AJ; Kozma K; Plangár I; Gyertyán I
J Integr Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 35164448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of processing speed training on cognitive functions and neural systems.
Takeuchi H; Kawashima R
Rev Neurosci; 2012 May; 23(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 22752786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Visuospatial over verbal demands in predicting Tower of London planning tasks.
Cheetham JM; Rahm B; Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM
Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):98-116. PubMed ID: 22229777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Higher intraindividual variability is associated with more forgetting and dedifferentiated memory functions in old age.
Papenberg G; Bäckman L; Chicherio C; Nagel IE; Heekeren HR; Lindenberger U; Li SC
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1879-88. PubMed ID: 21439990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Neuroimaging predictors of cognitive performance across a standardized neurocognitive battery.
Roalf DR; Ruparel K; Gur RE; Bilker W; Gerraty R; Elliott MA; Gallagher RS; Almasy L; Pogue-Geile MF; Prasad K; Wood J; Nimgaonkar VL; Gur RC
Neuropsychology; 2014 Mar; 28(2):161-176. PubMed ID: 24364396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Validity of the Mindstreams computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment.
Dwolatzky T; Whitehead V; Doniger GM; Simon ES; Schweiger A; Jaffe D; Chertkow H
J Mol Neurosci; 2004; 24(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 15314247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
Shipstead Z; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Association of Chronic Subjective Tinnitus with Neuro- Cognitive Performance.
Gudwani S; Munjal SK; Panda NK; Kohli A
Int Tinnitus J; 2017 Dec; 21(2):90-97. PubMed ID: 29336125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Dopamine and cognitive control: sex-by-genotype interactions influence the capacity to switch attention.
Gurvich C; Rossell SL
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():96-101. PubMed ID: 25510197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Development, Administration, and Structural Validity of a Brief, Computerized Neurocognitive Battery: Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers.
Moore TM; Gur RC; Thomas ML; Brown GG; Nock MK; Savitt AP; Keilp JG; Heeringa S; Ursano RJ; Stein MB;
Assessment; 2019 Jan; 26(1):125-143. PubMed ID: 28135828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Validity of a multi-domain computerized cognitive assessment battery for patients with multiple sclerosis.
Golan D; Wilken J; Doniger GM; Fratto T; Kane R; Srinivasan J; Zarif M; Bumstead B; Buhse M; Fafard L; Topalli I; Gudesblatt M
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2019 May; 30():154-162. PubMed ID: 30772674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Relationship of affect recognition with psychopathology and cognitive performance in schizophrenia.
Bozikas VP; Kosmidis MH; Anezoulaki D; Giannakou M; Karavatos A
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2004 Jul; 10(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 15327733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control.
Draheim C; Tsukahara JS; Martin JD; Mashburn CA; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):242-275. PubMed ID: 32700925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Establishing Measurement Equivalence Across Computer- and Paper-Based Tests of Spatial Cognition.
Bailey SKT; Neigel AR; Dhanani LY; Sims VK
Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):340-350. PubMed ID: 29244530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Repeated computerized cognitive testing: Performance shifts and test-retest reliability in healthy older adults.
White N; Flannery L; McClintock A; Machado L
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Mar; 41(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 30320531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Normative data for a battery of free recall, cued recall and recognition tests in the elderly Italian population.
Coluccia E; Gamboz N; Brandimonte MA
Neurol Sci; 2011 Dec; 32(6):1103-14. PubMed ID: 21918879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cognitive functioning in the early course of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders: timing and patterns.
González-Blanch C; Alvarez-Jiménez M; Rodríguez-Sánchez JM; Pérez-Iglesias R; Vázquez-Barquero JL; Crespo-Facorro B
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 256(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 16788772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Slower speed-of-processing of cognitive tasks is associated with presence of the apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele.
O'Hara R; Sommer B; Way N; Kraemer HC; Taylor J; Murphy G
J Psychiatr Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 17250852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
