These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
596 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945880)
1. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Tu Y; Xue H; Ma T; Wen T; Yang T; Zhang H; Cai M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Mar; 25(3):729-735. PubMed ID: 27225890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA. Kim SM; Park YS; Ha CW; Lim SJ; Moon YW Orthopedics; 2012 Sep; 35(9):e1334-9. PubMed ID: 22955398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can accuracy of component alignment be improved with Oxford UKA Microplasty® instrumentation? Ng JP; Fan JCH; Lau LCM; Tse TTS; Wan SYC; Hung YW J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):354. PubMed ID: 32843044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of sagittal and coronal planes with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Gaudiani MA; Nwachukwu BU; Baviskar JV; Sharma M; Ranawat AS Knee; 2017 Aug; 24(4):837-843. PubMed ID: 28579132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Influence of rotatory malposition of femoral implant in failure of unicompartimental medial knee prosthesis]. Assor M; Aubaniac JM Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Sep; 92(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 17088741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term results of the Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial arthritis. Parmaksizoğlu AS; Kabukçuoğlu Y; Ozkaya U; Bilgili F; Aslan A Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 20676016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Rosenberger RE; Fink C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Tecklenburg K; Hoser C Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Dec; 16(12):1133-40. PubMed ID: 18810391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Jenny JY; Boeri C Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2003 Jan; 11(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12548450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk? Bové JC Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preservation of femoral and tibial coronal alignment to improve biomechanical effects of medial unicompartment knee arthroplasty: Computational study. Kang KT; Son J; Kwon SK; Kwon OR; Koh YG Biomed Mater Eng; 2018; 29(5):651-664. PubMed ID: 30400078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique. Manzotti A; Cerveri P; Pullen C; Confalonieri N Int Orthop; 2014 Feb; 38(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 24305791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Superior alignment but no difference in clinical outcome after minimally invasive computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MICA-UKA). Zhang Z; Zhu W; Zhu L; Du Y Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3419-3424. PubMed ID: 25423875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant and limb alignment outcomes for conventional and navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Valenzuela GA; Jacobson NA; Geist DJ; Valenzuela RG; Teitge RA J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):463-8. PubMed ID: 23142438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation. Kerens B; Leenders AM; Schotanus MGM; Boonen B; Tuinebreijer WE; Emans PJ; Jong B; Kort NP Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29282486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy of Alignment of Femoral and Tibial Component of the Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Zimmer Microplasty® Instrumentation]. Trnka T; Musil D; Held M; Sadovský St P Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2021; 88(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 34534059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]