BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

992 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994621)

  • 1. Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings.
    Costa MJ; Kenny MB; Naib ZM
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 1994621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
    Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGCUS) detected on cervical cytology screening.
    Kennedy AW; Salmieri SS; Wirth SL; Biscotti CV; Tuason LJ; Travarca MJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8898161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytologic findings in 13 cases.
    Zhou C; Hayes MM; Clement PB; Thomson TA
    Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 9801202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Status of fractionated abrasion and vaginal endocervical cytology in diagnosis of endometrial cancer].
    Schild R; Kutta T
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Aug; 52(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 1397942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.
    Saigo PE; Wolinska WH; Kim WS; Hajdu SI
    Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 3863425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphometric analysis of dysplasia in cervical cone biopsy specimens in cases with false-negative cytology.
    Hartman B; Kaplan B; Boone D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 68(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 3785796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endocervical adenocarcinomas with prominent endometrial or endomyometrial involvement simulating primary endometrial carcinomas: utility of HPV DNA detection and immunohistochemical expression of p16 and hormone receptors to confirm the cervical origin of the corpus tumor.
    Yemelyanova A; Vang R; Seidman JD; Gravitt PE; Ronnett BM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):914-24. PubMed ID: 19295407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significance of normal endometrial cells detected by cervical cytology.
    Cherkis RC; Patten SF; Andrews TJ; Dickinson JC; Patten FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Feb; 71(2):242-4. PubMed ID: 3336559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma.
    Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
    Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increase in accuracy of typing of carcinoma of the uterine cervix by combined use of histology and cytology.
    Verma K; Kapila K
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 6952712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of types and primary sites of malignant tumors by examination of exfoliated tumor cells in serous fluids. Comparison with the diagnostic accuracy on small histologic biopsies.
    Spieler P; Gloor F
    Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(5):753-67. PubMed ID: 2996273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
    Hall S; Lörincz A; Shah F; Sherman ME; Abbas F; Paull G; Kurman RJ; Shah KV
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ThinPrep preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears. Practical considerations.
    Bur M; Knowles K; Pekow P; Corral O; Donovan J
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):631-42. PubMed ID: 7631535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
    Sherman ME; Kelly D
    Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.