BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994631)

  • 1. Information, discrimination and divergence in cytology. III. Optimization of classification of Papanicolaou smears.
    Okagaki T; Fujimura M; Zelterman D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 1994631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information, discrimination and divergence in cytology. II. Total discrimination as a measure of performance.
    Okagaki T; Zelterman D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 1994629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information, discrimination and divergence in cytology. IV. Quality control in diagnostic cytology.
    Okagaki T; Fujimura M; Brooker DC; McIntosh L; Zelterman D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 1994632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as determined by cytology and colposcopic biopsy.
    Bamford PN; Beilby JO; Steele SJ; Vlies R
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(5):482-4. PubMed ID: 6578644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validation of cervical cytology. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Soost HJ; Lange HJ; Lehmacher W; Ruffing-Kullmann B
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 1994641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
    Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
    Kohan S; Noumoff J; Beckman EM; Morris M; Weiner E; Douglas GW
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 4009560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphologic scales and relative distances between lesions identified on Papanicolaou smears.
    Okagaki T; Lau M; Brooker DC; Zelterman D
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Aug; 14(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 1388571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Brotzman GL; Julian TM
    Am Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 53(4):1154-62. PubMed ID: 8629563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnostic concordance in gynecologic cytology].
    Lazcano Ponce EC; de Ruiz PA; Martínez Arias C; Murguía Riechers L
    Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9380963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia associated with exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a clinical and pathologic study.
    Orr JW; Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM; Hatch KD; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jul; 58(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 7195532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervicovaginal cytology in an indigent population. Comparison of results for 1964, 1981 and 1989.
    Costa MJ; Grimes C; Tackett E; Naib ZM
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 1994635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
    Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.