These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994633)

  • 1. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA-cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Böcking A; Hilgarth M; Auffermann W; Hack-Werdier C; Fischer-Becker D; von Kalkreuth G
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 3466496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
    Wagner D; Noltenius HW
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Premalignant and malignant changes in the uterine cervix in women younger than 30 years].
    Postruznik S; Jurić M; Giljanović L; Strmo V
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1985; 25(5-6):121-4. PubMed ID: 3837134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
    Bayrle W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cytological differential diagnostic accuracy in severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the cervix and possible clinical consequences (author's transl)].
    Schuhmann RA; Kraus H; Geier G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Oct; 41(10):668-71. PubMed ID: 6914976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
    Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early detection of cervical cancer through acetic acid application--an aided visual inspection.
    Singh V; Sehgal A; Parashari A; Sodhani P; Satyanarayana L
    Singapore Med J; 2001 Aug; 42(8):351-4. PubMed ID: 11764051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The combined use of cytology and colposcopy in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Lozowski MS; Mishriki Y; Talebian F; Solitare G
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 6954809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with 40,000 Papanicolaou smears.
    Sandmire HF; Austin SD; Bechtel RC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jul; 48(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 934574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnostic conization of the uterine cervix. II. Comparison of histological diagnoses with cytological and colposcopic tentative diagnoses].
    Geissler U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(17):1028-32. PubMed ID: 919877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
    Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
    Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
    Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
    Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix.
    Berner A; Høeg K; Oppedal BR
    Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1980; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7439010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.