497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994633)
1. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Pairwuti S
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA-cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix.
Böcking A; Hilgarth M; Auffermann W; Hack-Werdier C; Fischer-Becker D; von Kalkreuth G
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 3466496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
Wagner D; Noltenius HW
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Premalignant and malignant changes in the uterine cervix in women younger than 30 years].
Postruznik S; Jurić M; Giljanović L; Strmo V
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1985; 25(5-6):121-4. PubMed ID: 3837134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
Bayrle W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cytological differential diagnostic accuracy in severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the cervix and possible clinical consequences (author's transl)].
Schuhmann RA; Kraus H; Geier G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Oct; 41(10):668-71. PubMed ID: 6914976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early detection of cervical cancer through acetic acid application--an aided visual inspection.
Singh V; Sehgal A; Parashari A; Sodhani P; Satyanarayana L
Singapore Med J; 2001 Aug; 42(8):351-4. PubMed ID: 11764051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The combined use of cytology and colposcopy in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix.
Lozowski MS; Mishriki Y; Talebian F; Solitare G
Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 6954809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with 40,000 Papanicolaou smears.
Sandmire HF; Austin SD; Bechtel RC
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jul; 48(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 934574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic conization of the uterine cervix. II. Comparison of histological diagnoses with cytological and colposcopic tentative diagnoses].
Geissler U
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(17):1028-32. PubMed ID: 919877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix.
Berner A; Høeg K; Oppedal BR
Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1980; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7439010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
