These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994634)
1. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings. Costa MJ; Kenny MB; Naib ZM Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 1994621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression? Sherman ME; Kelly D Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia. Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma. Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear? Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia. Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes. Elias A; Linthorst G; Bekker B; Vooijs PG Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 6575534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytologic findings in 13 cases. Zhou C; Hayes MM; Clement PB; Thomson TA Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 9801202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer. Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions. van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear. van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HPV presence precedes abnormal cytology in women developing cervical cancer and signals false negative smears. Zielinski GD; Snijders PJ; Rozendaal L; Voorhorst FJ; van der Linden HC; Runsink AP; de Schipper FA; Meijer CJ Br J Cancer; 2001 Aug; 85(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 11487272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. Pairwuti S Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases. Krane JF; Granter SR; Trask CE; Hogan CL; Lee KR Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11241260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of sample takers on the cellular composition of cervical smears. Vooijs GP; Elias A; van der Graaf Y; Poelen-van de Berg M Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 3459325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os]. Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells. Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]