116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994636)
1. Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples.
Boon ME; Zeppa P; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Kok LP
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 1994636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Pairwuti S
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in situ involving endocervical glands in endocervical cytobrush specimens.
Selvaggi SM
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(5):687-92. PubMed ID: 8091898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
Selvaggi SM
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The identification of atypical reserve cells in smears of patients with premalignant and malignant changes in the squamous and glandular epithelium of the uterine cervix.
Beyer-Boon ME; Verdonk GW
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(5):305-11. PubMed ID: 281835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of the special properties of monolayer cell preparations for automated cervical cytology on visual evaluation and classification. With an estimation of the number of cells required to be screened.
Schwarz G; Schwarz M; Schenck U
Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Sep; 5(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 6651018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
