BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994637)

  • 1. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
    Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples.
    Boon ME; Zeppa P; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Kok LP
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 1994636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test].
    Broso P; Buffetti G; Sacco A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
    Selvaggi SM
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
    Selvaggi SM; Guidos BJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center.
    Szarewski A; Curran G; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Kocjan G; Bounds W; Guillebaud J
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 8328239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush.
    Crouse BJ; Elliott BA; Nesin N
    Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.