These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19948328)

  • 1. Interpreting low template DNA profiles.
    Balding DJ; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19948328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculating the weight of evidence in low-template forensic DNA casework.
    Lohmueller KE; Rudin N
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S243-9. PubMed ID: 23082963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles.
    Cowen S; Debenham P; Dixon A; Kutranov S; Thomson J; Way K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):400-6. PubMed ID: 20952266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.
    Lohmueller KE; Rudin N; Inman K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():1-11. PubMed ID: 24841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision analysis for the genotype designation in low-template-DNA profiles.
    Gittelson S; Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():118-33. PubMed ID: 24528590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
    Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of multiple allelic drop-outs in forensic RMNE calculations.
    Christophe VN; Dieter D; Filip VN
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():243-249. PubMed ID: 26280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
    Foley MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encoding of low-quality DNA profiles as genotype probability matrices for improved profile comparisons, relatedness evaluation and database searches.
    Ryan K; Williams DG; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():227-239. PubMed ID: 27768939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.
    Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():82-9. PubMed ID: 25082140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.