These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19948745)

  • 1. Confidence intervals that match Fisher's exact or Blaker's exact tests.
    Fay MP
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):373-4. PubMed ID: 19948745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved exact confidence intervals for the odds ratio in two independent binomial samples.
    Lin CY; Yang MC
    Biom J; 2006 Dec; 48(6):1008-19. PubMed ID: 17240658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unconditional versions of several tests commonly used in the analysis of contingency tables.
    Freidlin B
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):264-7. PubMed ID: 11318165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dealing with discreteness: making 'exact' confidence intervals for proportions, differences of proportions, and odds ratios more exact.
    Agresti A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Jan; 12(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 12617505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact confidence intervals for the relative risk and the odds ratio.
    Wang W; Shan G
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):985-95. PubMed ID: 26228945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing differences in proportions.
    Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
    Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stratified Fisher's exact test and its sample size calculation.
    Jung SH
    Biom J; 2014 Jan; 56(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 24395208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On small-sample confidence intervals for parameters in discrete distributions.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):963-71. PubMed ID: 11550951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exact likelihood ratio and score confidence intervals for the binomial proportion.
    Somerville MC; Brown RS
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):120-8. PubMed ID: 23471686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):43-70. PubMed ID: 7613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing association with Fisher's Exact test.
    Warner P
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2013 Oct; 39(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 24062499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals for difference in proportions for matched pairs compatible with exact McNemar's or sign tests.
    Fay MP; Lumbard K
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1147-1159. PubMed ID: 33263202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact unconditional tests for a 2 x 2 matched-pairs design.
    Berger RL; Sidik K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):91-108. PubMed ID: 12665205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of continuous and discrete methods for combining probability values associated with matched-pairs t-test data.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):799-805. PubMed ID: 16060446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exact Bayesian p-values for a test of independence in a 2 × 2 contingency table with missing data.
    Lin Y; Lipsitz SR; Sinha D; Fitzmaurice G; Lipshultz S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3411-3419. PubMed ID: 28633606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.