87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19948931)
1. Moral pluralism versus the total view: why Singer is wrong about radical life extension.
Blackford R
J Med Ethics; 2009 Dec; 35(12):747-52. PubMed ID: 19948931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peter Singer's argument for utilitarianism.
Buckle S
Theor Med Bioeth; 2005; 26(3):175-94. PubMed ID: 16048068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical theory, "common morality," and professional obligations.
Alexandra A; Miller S
Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19199076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. African and Western moral theories in a bioethical context.
Metz T
Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19961513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prodigal and his brother: impartiality and the equal consideration of interests.
Coghlan P
Theor Med Bioeth; 2005; 26(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 16048069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deadly pluralism? Why death-concept, death-definition, death-criterion and death-test pluralism should be allowed, even though it creates some problems.
Zeiler K
Bioethics; 2009 Oct; 23(8):450-9. PubMed ID: 18554277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryo experimentation and the murder prohibition: a casuistic examination of the utilitarian and pro-life positions on the moral status of the embryo.
Sullivan L
Med Law; 1995; 14(5-6):369-86. PubMed ID: 8868497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response to "Utilitarianism shot down by its own men" by Tuija Takala (CQ Vol 12, No 4). Takala shoots herself in the foot.
Harris J
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2004; 13(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 15124406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of suffering and community in clinical ethics.
Loewy EH
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(2):83-9; discussion 90-107. PubMed ID: 1932807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Life and death matters: losing a sense of the value of human beings.
Cordner C
Theor Med Bioeth; 2005; 26(3):207-26. PubMed ID: 16048070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rethinking the morality of animal research.
Tannenbaum J; Rowan AN
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Oct; 15(5):32-43. PubMed ID: 3905706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can infants have interests in continued life?
Kaposy C
Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(4):301-30. PubMed ID: 17929196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Singer--and no end in sight? Or: can severely handicapped patients be "persons"?].
Grüning J
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1996 May; 35(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 8767543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why we need a theory of suffering, and lots of other theories as well: commentary.
Churchill LR
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 11642930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtue theory and abortion.
Hursthouse R
Philos Public Aff; 1991; 20(3):223-46. PubMed ID: 11659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient.
Murray TH
Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):329-43. PubMed ID: 3595055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two concepts of empirical ethics.
Parker M
Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):202-13. PubMed ID: 19338521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pluralism, tolerance and euthanasia.
Hehir JB
CHAC Rev; 1994; 22(2):4-10. PubMed ID: 10136020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can ethics take pluralism seriously?
Engelhardt HT
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):33-4. PubMed ID: 2793443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
