These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it! Lobmaier JS; Mast FW Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information. Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processing of configural and componential information in face-selective cortical areas. Zhao M; Cheung SH; Wong AC; Rhodes G; Chan EK; Chan WW; Hayward WG Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(3-4):160-7. PubMed ID: 24784503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task. Xu B; Tanaka JW J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face. Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia. Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance. Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling. Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces. Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration. Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces? Collishaw SM; Hole GJ Perception; 2002; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11954691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition. Sandford A; Burton AM Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modulations of eye movement patterns by spatial filtering during the learning and testing phases of an old/new face recognition task. Lemieux CL; Collin CA; Nelson EA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):536-50. PubMed ID: 25287618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]