These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19950752)

  • 1. [SEM investigation of composite restoration adaptation to enamel after use of total etch and self etch adhesive system].
    Dacić S; Dacić-Simonović D; Zivković S; Radicević G; Mitić A; Stanojević I; Veselinović A
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2009; 137(9-10):475-81. PubMed ID: 19950752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance of marginal enamel to acid solubility is influenced by restorative systems: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study.
    Prati C; Chersoni S; Suppa P; Breschi L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Jun; 7(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12750967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in-vitro study of microleakage around class V cavities bonded with a self-etching material versus a conventional two-bottle system.
    Salim S; Santini A; Husham A
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Jul; 13(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 16836814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pit and fissure sealing. Bonding of bulk-cured, low-filled, light-curing resins to bacteria-contaminated uncut enamel in high c-factor cavities.
    Tay FR; Frankenberger R; Carvalho RM; Pashley DH
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 15810478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
    Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesive.
    Perdigão J; Sezinando A; Gomes G
    Am J Dent; 2011 Aug; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 22016915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
    Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.
    Bortolotto T; Onisor I; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 17031673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.