BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19951025)

  • 1. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
    Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
    Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spinal motion and intradiscal pressure measurements before and after lumbar spine instrumentation with titanium or PEEK rods.
    Abode-Iyamah K; Kim SB; Grosland N; Kumar R; Belirgen M; Lim TH; Torner J; Hitchon PW
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 21(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 24314848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
    Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
    Gao SG; Lei GH; He HB; Liu H; Xiao WF; Wen T; Liang JY; Li KH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
    Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness.
    Lee JK; Gomez J; Michelsen C; Kim Y; Moldavsky M; Chinthakunta SR; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23921330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17633485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical Effect of L
    Cai XY; Sun MS; Huang YP; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Du CF; Yang Q
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
    Cabello J; Cavanilles-Walker JM; Iborra M; Ubierna MT; Covaro A; Roca J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Apr; 133(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 23371399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.
    Goel VK; Grauer JN; Patel TCh; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Vishnubhotla S; Matyas A; Cowgill I; Shaw M; Long R; Dick D; Panjabi MM; Serhan H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
    Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Hassan CR; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.