These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19952005)

  • 1. Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: evidence under construction vs. expert opinion.
    Engström AE; Sjauw KD; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J; 2010 Feb; 31(4):502; author reply 502-3. PubMed ID: 19952005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
    Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiogenic shock: to pump or not to pump?
    Thiele H; Schuler G
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Feb; 30(4):389-90. PubMed ID: 19181707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Thiele H; Sick P; Boudriot E; Diederich KW; Hambrecht R; Niebauer J; Schuler G
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Jul; 26(13):1276-83. PubMed ID: 15734771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: role of mechanical circulatory support.
    Aggarwal S; Slaughter MS
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 6(9):1223-35. PubMed ID: 18939910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) in cardiogenic shock.
    Fuernau G; Thiele H
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2013 Oct; 19(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 23995129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Windecker S
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2007 Oct; 13(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 17762230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined use of Impella device and intra-aortic balloon pump to improve survival in a patient in profound cardiogenic shock post cardiac arrest.
    Gupta A; Allaqaband S; Bajwa T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 74(6):975-6. PubMed ID: 19521993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term survival using intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous right ventricular assist device for biventricular mechanical support of cardiogenic shock.
    Atwater BD; Nee LM; Gimelli G
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Jul; 20(7):E205-7. PubMed ID: 18599903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Treating Cardiogenic Shock: Meta-Analysis.
    Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Seyfarth M; Henriques JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):358-360. PubMed ID: 27810348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous ventricular assist device support during off-pump surgical coronary revascularization.
    Gregoric ID; Poglajen G; Span M; Frazier OH; Loyalka P; Kar B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 86(2):637-9. PubMed ID: 18640347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: trends in management and outcome].
    Grazi M; Farina S; Assanelli E
    Recenti Prog Med; 2010 Mar; 101(3):99-105. PubMed ID: 20461950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-aortic balloon pump trials: questions, answers, and unresolved issues.
    Perera D; Lumley M; Pijls N; Patel MR
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 23780295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Percutaneous insertion of a left ventricular assist device for cardiogenic shock in a patient with a myocardial infarction].
    Ottervanger JP; de Feijter P; Gardien M; Serruys PW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Jan; 147(4):164-6. PubMed ID: 12635549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical versus pharmacologic support for cardiogenic shock.
    Dhar G; Jolly N
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 20049971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percutaneous circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: interventional bridge to recovery.
    Kar B; Basra SS; Shah NR; Loyalka P
    Circulation; 2012 Apr; 125(14):1809-17. PubMed ID: 22492948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of cardiogenic shock].
    Nadziakiewicz P; Knapik P; Gasior M; Kalarus Z; Poloński L; Zembala M
    Kardiol Pol; 2007 Jan; 65(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17295171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current status of percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock.
    Basra SS; Loyalka P; Kar B
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 26(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 21926617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Additional benefits from intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation?
    Sanborn TA
    Cardiology; 2010; 117(3):174-5. PubMed ID: 21051890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions without cardiogenic shock: trial sequential analysis of outcomes.
    Messori A; Fadda V; Maratea D; Trippoli S
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(4):4534-6. PubMed ID: 23890904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.