113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19952393)
1. [Methods to determine minimal clinically important difference].
Hu G; Huang Q; Huang Z; Sun Z
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Nov; 34(11):1058-62. PubMed ID: 19952393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal (clinically) important differences for the Fatigue Assessment Scale in sarcoidosis.
de Kleijn WP; De Vries J; Wijnen PA; Drent M
Respir Med; 2011 Sep; 105(9):1388-95. PubMed ID: 21700440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How can we assess outcomes of clinical trials: the MCID approach.
Make B
COPD; 2007 Sep; 4(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 17729062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the minimal clinically important differences in activity, fatigue, and sleep quality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Wells G; Li T; Maxwell L; MacLean R; Tugwell P
J Rheumatol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):280-9. PubMed ID: 17304654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues.
Tubach F; Wells GA; Ravaud P; Dougados M
J Rheumatol; 2005 Oct; 32(10):2025-9. PubMed ID: 16206363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of health status assessment measures in head and neck cancer: what do quality-of-life scores mean?
Funk GF; Karnell LH; Smith RB; Christensen AJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jul; 130(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 15262758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.
Revicki D; Hays RD; Cella D; Sloan J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18177782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimal clinically important difference for 7 measures of fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Goligher EC; Pouchot J; Brant R; Kherani RB; Aviña-Zubieta JA; Lacaille D; Lehman AJ; Ensworth S; Kopec J; Esdaile JM; Liang MH
J Rheumatol; 2008 Apr; 35(4):635-42. PubMed ID: 18322987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach.
de Vet HC; Ostelo RW; Terwee CB; van der Roer N; Knol DL; Beckerman H; Boers M; Bouter LM
Qual Life Res; 2007 Feb; 16(1):131-42. PubMed ID: 17033901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities.
Angst F; Aeschlimann A; Stucki G
Arthritis Rheum; 2001 Aug; 45(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 11501727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimal important difference thresholds and the standard error of measurement: is there a connection?
Wyrwich KW
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Feb; 14(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 15027502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How much is enough and who says so?
Kelleher CJ; Pleil AM; Reese PR; Burgess SM; Brodish PH
BJOG; 2004 Jun; 111(6):605-12. PubMed ID: 15198790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference on the Australian therapy outcome measures for occupational therapy (AusTOMs-OT).
Unsworth CA; Coulson M; Swinton L; Cole H; Sarigiannis M
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 25144830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review.
Jayadevappa R; Cook R; Chhatre S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():188-198. PubMed ID: 28676426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimal clinically important difference in myasthenia gravis: outcomes from a randomized trial.
Katzberg HD; Barnett C; Merkies IS; Bril V
Muscle Nerve; 2014 May; 49(5):661-5. PubMed ID: 24810970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients.
Hsieh YW; Wang CH; Wu SC; Chen PC; Sheu CF; Hsieh CL
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2007; 21(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17351082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Quality of My Life questionnaire: the minimal clinically important difference for pediatric rheumatology patients.
Gong GW; Young NL; Dempster H; Porepa M; Feldman BM
J Rheumatol; 2007 Mar; 34(3):581-7. PubMed ID: 17183614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
