These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19952494)

  • 1. Phantom study on radiotherapy planning using PET/CT--delineation of GTV by evaluating SUV.
    Uto F; Shiba E; Onoue S; Yoshimura H; Takada M; Tsuji Y; Fukugami S; Asakawa I; Tamamoto T; Hasegawa M
    J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 19952494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
    Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning.
    Hong R; Halama J; Bova D; Sethi A; Emami B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 17293230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static and moving phantom studies for radiation treatment planning in a positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) system.
    Okubo M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Shibata T; Kanamori S; Hanaoka K; Hosono M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 18756360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate?
    Biehl KJ; Kong FM; Dehdashti F; Jin JY; Mutic S; El Naqa I; Siegel BA; Bradley JD
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1808-12. PubMed ID: 17079814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FDG-PET/CT-based gross tumor volume contouring for radiation therapy planning: an experimental phantom study.
    Toya R; Murakami R; Tashiro K; Yoshida M; Sakamoto F; Kawanaka K; Shiraishi S; Nakaguchi Y; Tsujita N; Oya N; Tomiguchi S; Yamashita Y
    J Radiat Res; 2012; 53(2):338-41. PubMed ID: 22398846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer.
    Nestle U; Kremp S; Schaefer-Schuler A; Sebastian-Welsch C; Hellwig D; Rübe C; Kirsch CM
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1342-8. PubMed ID: 16085592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of integrated PET/CT to the evolving definition of treatment volumes in radiation treatment planning in lung cancer.
    Ashamalla H; Rafla S; Parikh K; Mokhtar B; Goswami G; Kambam S; Abdel-Dayem H; Guirguis A; Ross P; Evola A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1016-23. PubMed ID: 15979817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
    Dong X; Wu P; Sun X; Li W; Wan H; Yu J; Xing L
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25708154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy: a phantom study for setting internal target volume of biological target volume.
    Kawakami W; Takemura A; Yokoyama K; Nakajima K; Yokoyama S; Koshida K
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jan; 10():1. PubMed ID: 25567003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The integration of PET-CT scans from different hospitals into radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Ollers M; Bosmans G; van Baardwijk A; Dekker A; Lambin P; Teule J; Thimister W; Rhamy A; De Ruysscher D
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Apr; 87(1):142-6. PubMed ID: 18207269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical application of 4D 18F-FDG PET/CT on gross tumor volume delineation for radiotherapy planning in esophageal squamous cell cancer.
    Wang YC; Hsieh TC; Yu CY; Yen KY; Chen SW; Yang SN; Chien CR; Hsu SM; Pan T; Kao CH; Liang JA
    J Radiat Res; 2012 Jul; 53(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 22843625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A gel tumour phantom for assessment of the accuracy of manual and automatic delineation of gross tumour volume from FDG-PET/CT.
    Skretting A; Evensen JF; Løndalen AM; Bogsrud TV; Glomset OK; Eilertsen K
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 23075421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver variability among measurements of the maximum and mean standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and measurements of tumor size on diagnostic CT in patients with pulmonary tumors.
    Huang YE; Chen CF; Huang YJ; Konda SD; Appelbaum DE; Pu Y
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):782-8. PubMed ID: 20707663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometrical differences in target volumes based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography maximum intensity projection images of primary thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Guo Y; Li J; Wang W; Zhang Y; Wang J; Duan Y; Shang D; Fu Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2014; 27(8):744-50. PubMed ID: 24915760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tumor volume and standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG PET.
    Tylski P; Stute S; Grotus N; Doyeux K; Hapdey S; Gardin I; Vanderlinden B; Buvat I
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Feb; 51(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20080896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target volume delineation for preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer: inter-observer variability and potential impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging.
    Krengli M; Cannillo B; Turri L; Bagnasacco P; Berretta L; Ferrara T; Galliano M; Gribaudo S; Melano A; Munoz F; Sciacero P; Tseroni V; Bassi MC; Brambilla M; Inglese E
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Aug; 9(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 20626204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
    Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of standardized uptake value-based positron emission tomography and computed tomography target volumes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.
    Vali FS; Nagda S; Hall W; Sinacore J; Gao M; Lee SH; Hong R; Shoup M; Emami B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 20199850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
    Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.