106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19953059)
1. [Evaluation of two classifications systems for pelvic prolapse on dynamic MRI].
Novellas S; Mondot L; Bafghi A; Fournol M; Baudin G; Coco L; Bongain A; Chevallier P
J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Pt 1):1717-24. PubMed ID: 19953059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI findings before and after prolapse surgery.
Alt CD; Brocker KA; Lenz F; Sohn C; Kauczor HU; Hallscheidt P
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):495-504. PubMed ID: 23939382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms.
Lakeman MM; Zijta FM; Peringa J; Nederveen AJ; Stoker J; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1547-54. PubMed ID: 22531955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines.
Rosenkrantz AB; Lewis MT; Yalamanchili S; Lim RP; Wong S; Bennett GL
Clin Radiol; 2014 Feb; 69(2):e71-7. PubMed ID: 24290773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of new MRI-based measurements to differentiate low and high stages of pelvic organ prolapse using support vector machines.
Onal S; Lai-Yuen S; Bao P; Weitzenfeld A; Hogue D; Hart S
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 25429825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse compared with clinical examination.
Pannu HK; Scatarige JC; Eng J
Acad Radiol; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1245-51. PubMed ID: 21795069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
Gupta S; Sharma JB; Hari S; Kumar S; Roy KK; Singh N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 22678559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging.
Woodfield CA; Hampton BS; Sung V; Brody JM
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Jun; 20(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 19434386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate anterior pelvic prolapse: H line is the key.
Rechi-Sierra K; Sánchez-Ballester F; García-Ibáñez J; Pardo-Duarte P; Flores-DelaTorre M; Monzó-Cataluña A; López-Alcina E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Apr; 40(4):1042-1047. PubMed ID: 33783877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse.
Broekhuis SR; Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Vierhout ME; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Feb; 20(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 19002366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical study on pubococcygeal line determined by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging used in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse].
Miao YL; Zhang XH; Wu J; Kang Y; Hong N; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 45(12):900-3. PubMed ID: 21211420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging-identified pelvic organ prolapse in pre- and postmenopausal women without clinically evident pelvic organ descent.
Cimsit C; Yoldemir T; Akpinar IN
Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1418-1424. PubMed ID: 26041768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dynamic magnetic resonance defaecography with rectal contrast and conventional defaecography for posterior pelvic floor compartment prolapse.
van Iersel JJ; Formijne Jonkers HA; Verheijen PM; Broeders IA; Heggelman BG; Sreetharan V; Fütterer JJ; Somers I; van der Leest M; Consten EC
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jan; 19(1):O46-O53. PubMed ID: 27870169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI pelvic landmark angles in the assessment of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Ginath S; Garely A; Luchs JS; Shahryarinejad A; Olivera C; Zhou S; Ascher-Walsh C; Condrea A; Brodman M; Vardy M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 20730542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Imaging pelvic floor prolapse].
Deval B; Vulierme MP; Poilpot S; Menu Y; Levardon M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Feb; 32(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 12592178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used?
Fauconnier A; Zareski E; Abichedid J; Bader G; Falissard B; Fritel X
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 17696158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Aid To Preoperative-Planning Of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Memon B; Shoukat S; Sultana N; Parveen T; Fatima N; Mehmood T
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(3):382-385. PubMed ID: 34487642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-resolution anorectal manometry and dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging are complementary technologies.
Jodorkovsky D; Macura KJ; Gearhart SL; Dunbar KB; Stein EM; Clarke JO
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jan; 30(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 25088015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating functional disorders of female pelvic floor.
Torricelli P; Pecchi A; Caruso Lombardi A; Vetruccio E; Vetruccio S; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(5-6):488-500. PubMed ID: 12207184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.
Singh K; Reid WM; Berger LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 11483907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
