BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19954243)

  • 1. Electronic polarization is important in stabilizing the native structures of proteins.
    Ji CG; Zhang JZ
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Dec; 113(49):16059-64. PubMed ID: 19954243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-protein hydrogen bonding is dynamically stabilized by electronic polarization.
    Duan LL; Mei Y; Zhang QG; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Mar; 130(11):115102. PubMed ID: 19317568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation of NMR data reveals that proteins' local structures are stabilized by electronic polarization.
    Tong Y; Ji CG; Mei Y; Zhang JZ
    J Am Chem Soc; 2009 Jun; 131(24):8636-41. PubMed ID: 19485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some practical approaches to treating electrostatic polarization of proteins.
    Ji C; Mei Y
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2795-803. PubMed ID: 24883956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NMR scalar coupling constant reveals that intraprotein hydrogen bonds are dynamically stabilized by electronic polarization.
    Ji CG; Zhang JZ
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Oct; 113(42):13898-900. PubMed ID: 19791787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communication: Quantum polarized fluctuating charge model: a practical method to include ligand polarizability in biomolecular simulations.
    Kimura SR; Rajamani R; Langley DR
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Dec; 135(23):231101. PubMed ID: 22191857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ab initio protein structure prediction with force field parameters derived from water-phase quantum chemical calculation.
    Katagiri D; Fuji H; Neya S; Hoshino T
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Sep; 29(12):1930-44. PubMed ID: 18366016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folding of a helix at room temperature is critically aided by electrostatic polarization of intraprotein hydrogen bonds.
    Duan LL; Mei Y; Zhang D; Zhang QG; Zhang JZ
    J Am Chem Soc; 2010 Aug; 132(32):11159-64. PubMed ID: 20698682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures.
    Feig M; Onufriev A; Lee MS; Im W; Case DA; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Jan; 25(2):265-84. PubMed ID: 14648625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model.
    Patel S; Mackerell AD; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Sep; 25(12):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15224394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein polarization is critical to stabilizing AF-2 and helix-2' domains in ligand binding to PPAR-gamma.
    Ji CG; Zhang JZ
    J Am Chem Soc; 2008 Dec; 130(50):17129-33. PubMed ID: 19007119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
    Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of protein-ligand interaction energies by a fragmentation approach combining high-level quantum chemistry with classical many-body effects.
    Söderhjelm P; Aquilante F; Ryde U
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Aug; 113(32):11085-94. PubMed ID: 19618955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
    Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating receptor flexibility in the molecular design of protein interfaces.
    Li L; Liang S; Pilcher MM; Meroueh SO
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):575-86. PubMed ID: 19643976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coarse-grained protein model with residue orientation energies derived from atomic force fields.
    Betancourt MR
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Nov; 113(44):14824-30. PubMed ID: 19817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides and proteins with a continuum electrostatic model based on screened Coulomb potentials.
    Hassan SA; Mehler EL; Zhang D; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 12596268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.