These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19954824)

  • 1. Response to "a case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy".
    Nezhat F; Cho J; Chuang L
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):589-90; author reply 590-1. PubMed ID: 19954824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the Editor regarding "a case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy".
    Hall JB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):588-9; author reply 590-1. PubMed ID: 19647306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
    Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
    Bandera CA; Magrina JF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience.
    Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital.
    Sert MB; Abeler V
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):600-4. PubMed ID: 21353294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review.
    Kruijdenberg CB; van den Einden LC; Hendriks JC; Zusterzeel PL; Bekkers RL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 21236473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Reynisson P; Persson J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 23603368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
    Sert B; Abeler V
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
    Magrina JF; Kho R; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19176237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic radical hysterectomy.
    Fanning J; Hojat R; Johnson J; Fenton B
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Feb; 61(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 19204661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
    Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
    Shafer A; Boggess JF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S18-23. PubMed ID: 18771796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique.
    Magrina JF; Pawlina W; Kho RM; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):605-9. PubMed ID: 21419478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
    Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.