These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19955156)

  • 1. Personality and collective decision-making in foraging herbivores.
    Michelena P; Jeanson R; Deneubourg JL; Sibbald AM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Apr; 277(1684):1093-9. PubMed ID: 19955156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more.
    Kurvers RH; Prins HH; van Wieren SE; van Oers K; Nolet BA; Ydenberg RC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):601-8. PubMed ID: 19864281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interplay between personalities and social interactions affects the cohesion of the group and the speed of aggregation.
    Planas-Sitjà I; Nicolis SC; Sempo G; Deneubourg JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201053. PubMed ID: 30089129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of boldness on decision-making in barnacle geese is group-size-dependent.
    Kurvers RH; Adamczyk VM; van Wieren SE; Prins HH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1714):2018-24. PubMed ID: 21123271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shy herbivores forage more efficiently than bold ones regardless of information-processing overload.
    Tan MK; Chang CC; Tan HTW
    Behav Processes; 2018 Apr; 149():52-58. PubMed ID: 29421222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-dependent conspecific attraction to food patches.
    Beauchamp G; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2014 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 25165454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual personality and the spatial distribution of groups of grazing animals: an example with sheep.
    Sibbald AM; Erhard HW; McLeod JE; Hooper RJ
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 19660534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personality affects the foraging response of a mammalian herbivore to the dual costs of food and fear.
    Mella VS; Ward AJ; Banks PB; McArthur C
    Oecologia; 2015 Jan; 177(1):293-303. PubMed ID: 25294220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders.
    Hunt ER; Mi B; Fernandez C; Wong BM; Pruitt JN; Pinter-Wollman N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1886):. PubMed ID: 30185649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds.
    Aplin LM; Farine DR; Mann RP; Sheldon BC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20141016. PubMed ID: 24990682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agonistic behaviour and energy metabolism of bold and shy swimming crabs
    Su X; Sun Y; Liu D; Wang F; Liu J; Zhu B
    J Exp Biol; 2019 Feb; 222(Pt 3):. PubMed ID: 30559303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.
    Keiser CN; Pruitt JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141424. PubMed ID: 25320170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between boldness, foraging performance and behavioural plasticity across social contexts.
    Ólafsdóttir GÁ; Magellan K
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2016; 70(11):1879-1889. PubMed ID: 27784956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conspecific attraction and shelter selection in gregarious insects.
    Jeanson R; Deneubourg JL
    Am Nat; 2007 Jul; 170(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 17853991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What's your move? Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal populations.
    Spiegel O; Leu ST; Bull CM; Sih A
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Jan; 20(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 28000433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collective selection of food patches in Drosophila.
    Lihoreau M; Clarke IM; Buhl C; Sumpter DJ; Simpson SJ
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Mar; 219(Pt 5):668-75. PubMed ID: 26747899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group personality during collective decision-making: a multi-level approach.
    Planas-Sitjà I; Deneubourg JL; Gibon C; Sempo G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Mar; 282(1802):. PubMed ID: 25652834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personality composition determines social learning pathways within shoaling fish.
    Hasenjager MJ; Hoppitt W; Dugatkin LA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Oct; 287(1936):20201871. PubMed ID: 33023411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who directs group movement? Leader effort versus follower preference in stickleback fish of different personality.
    Nakayama S; Harcourt JL; Johnstone RA; Manica A
    Biol Lett; 2016 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 27194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personality predicts foraging site fidelity and trip repeatability in a marine predator.
    Harris SM; Descamps S; Sneddon LU; Bertrand P; Chastel O; Patrick SC
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 31541578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.