BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19955328)

  • 1. Experimental investigation of the concept of a 'breathing zone' using a mannequin exposed to a point source of inertial/sedimenting particles emitted with momentum.
    Lidén G; Waher J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jan; 54(1):100-16. PubMed ID: 19955328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental methods to determine inhalability and personal sampler performance for aerosols in ultra-low windspeed environments.
    Schmees DK; Wu YH; Vincent JH
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1426-36. PubMed ID: 19037484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the closed-face cassette at different orientations while measuring total particles.
    Cook DM; Sleeth DK; Thiese MS; Larson RR
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 25337937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
    Lidén G; Surakka J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance study of personal inhalable aerosol samplers at ultra-low wind speeds.
    Sleeth DK; Vincent JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 21985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a novel personal nanoparticle sampler.
    Zhou Y; Irshad H; Tsai CJ; Hung SM; Cheng YS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Feb; 16(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24337074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and computational fluid dynamics investigation of a personal, high flow inhalable sampler.
    Anthony TR; Landázuri AC; Van Dyke M; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jun; 54(4):427-42. PubMed ID: 20418278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
    Brouwer DH; Gijsbers JH; Lurvink MW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jul; 48(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 15240340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention.
    Borsh FB; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Andrews R; Ashley K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Sep; 16(9):634-642. PubMed ID: 31298629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of high flow rate samplers for respirable particle collection.
    Lee T; Kim SW; Chisholm WP; Slaven J; Harper M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Aug; 54(6):697-709. PubMed ID: 20660144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-zone model application to breathing zone and area welding fume concentration data.
    Boelter FW; Simmons CE; Berman L; Scheff P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 May; 6(5):298-306. PubMed ID: 19266377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of IOM personal sampler at different flow rates.
    Zhou Y; Cheng YS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 19953412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the european rubber manufacturing industry.
    de Vocht F; Huizer D; Prause M; Jakobsson K; Peplonska B; Straif K; Kromhout H
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2006 Sep; 79(8):621-9. PubMed ID: 16506045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.
    Koehler KA; Anthony TR; Van Dyke M; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 21965462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.