These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19955626)

  • 1. Determining the spill flow discharge of combined sewer overflows using rating curves based on computational fluid dynamics instead of the standard weir equation.
    Fach S; Sitzenfrei R; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(12):3035-43. PubMed ID: 19955626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of computational techniques--evaluation of CSO efficiency for suspended solids separation.
    Pollert I; Stránský D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 12666813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probabilistic modelling of combined sewer overflow using the First Order Reliability Method.
    Thorndahl S; Schaarup-Jensen K; Jensen JB
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1337-44. PubMed ID: 18495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separate and combined sewer systems: a long-term modelling approach.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):555-65. PubMed ID: 19657150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Solids separation efficiency of combined sewer overflows.
    Luyckx G; Vaes G; Berlamont J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 15790230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SIPSON--simulation of interaction between pipe flow and surface overland flow in networks.
    Djordjević S; Prodanović D; Maksimović C; Ivetić M; Savić D
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):275-83. PubMed ID: 16248205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of combined sewer overflow discharge: a software sensor approach based on local water level measurements.
    Ahm M; Thorndahl S; Nielsen JE; Rasmussen MR
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 74(11):2683-2696. PubMed ID: 27973373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in water quality parameters due to in-sewer processes.
    Boxall J; Shepherd W; Guymer I; Fox K
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):343-50. PubMed ID: 12793699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of urban flooding by dual drainage simulation model RisUrSim.
    Schmitt TG; Thomas M; Ettrich N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 16248203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of measurement campaigns for calibration of a conceptual sewer model.
    Kleidorfer M; Möderl M; Fach S; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1523-30. PubMed ID: 19403965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sewer modelling based on highly distributed calibration data sets and multi-objective auto-calibration schemes.
    Muschalla D; Schneider S; Schröter K; Gamerith V; Gruber G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1547-54. PubMed ID: 18520011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of a subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland for CSO treatment.
    Dittmer U; Meyer D; Langergraber G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(9):225-32. PubMed ID: 16042262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty in urban flood damage assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation.
    Freni G; La Loggia G; Notaro V
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(12):2979-93. PubMed ID: 20555194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P controller calibration for the real time control of moveable weirs in [corrected] sewer channels.
    Campisano A; Creaco E; Modica C
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2237-44. PubMed ID: 19494464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of real time control of sewer systems on treatment plant performance and receiving water quality.
    Frehmann T; Niemann A; Ustohal P; Geiger WF
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11902474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emission standards versus immission standards for assessing the impact of urban drainage on ephemeral receiving water bodies.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1617-29. PubMed ID: 20351441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of conventional rule based flow control with control processes based on fuzzy logic in a combined sewer system.
    Klepiszewski K; Schmitt TG
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):77-84. PubMed ID: 12380977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reaeration in sewers.
    Huisman JL; Weber N; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(5):1089-100. PubMed ID: 14975641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity analysis of surface runoff generation in urban flood forecasting.
    Simões NE; Leitão JP; Maksimović C; Sá Marques A; Pina R
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2595-601. PubMed ID: 20453333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probabilistic emission and immission modelling: case-study of the combined sewer-WWTP-receiving water system at Dessel (Belgium).
    Willems P; Berlamont J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):117-24. PubMed ID: 11902462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.