BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19955730)

  • 1. Electric acoustic stimulation in children.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():135-143. PubMed ID: 19955730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Helbig S; Baumann U
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
    Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS).
    Wilson BS
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():56-66. PubMed ID: 21756584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electric acoustic stimulation in patients with postlingual severe high-frequency hearing loss: clinical experience.
    Arnoldner C; Helbig S; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS; Riss D; Gstoettner W
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():116-124. PubMed ID: 19955728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incomplete cochlear partition type II variants as an indicator of congenital partial deafness: a first report.
    Ha JF; Wood B; Krishnaswamy J; Rajan GP
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 22805102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12500. PubMed ID: 28970567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing Preservation During Cochlear Implantation and Electroacoustic Stimulation in Patients With SLC26A4 Mutations.
    Roh KJ; Park S; Jung JS; Moon IS; Kim SH; Bang MY; Choi JY
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 28796087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.