These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19956036)

  • 1. Anatomic midline marking during cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C: an alternative, simple, and reliable method: technical note.
    Barbagallo GM; Corbino LA; Papavero L; Fritzsche E; Albanese V
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):610-4. PubMed ID: 19956036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of parallax on intraoperative positioning of the Charité artificial disc.
    Petilon J; Hardenbrook M; Sukovich W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 18679098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
    Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
    Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Centering of cervical disc replacements: usefulness of intraoperative anteroposterior fluoroscopic guidance to center cervical disc replacements: study on 20 discocerv (scient'x prosthesis).
    Kouyoumdjian P; Bronsard N; Vital JM; Gille O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1572-7. PubMed ID: 19564767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
    Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The manubrium as an external guide for centralizing anterior cervical plates: technique tips and initial experience.
    Chin KR; Stieber JR; Mehta S; Cohen JD; Auerbach JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(7):E244-7. PubMed ID: 20195193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Leary SP; Regan JJ; Lanman TH; Wagner WH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1001-11. PubMed ID: 17450076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Fong SY; DuPlessis SJ; Casha S; Hurlbert RJ
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16651216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Yi S; Kim KN; Yang MS; Yang JW; Kim H; Ha Y; Yoon DH; Shin HC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(16):1556-61. PubMed ID: 20581764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncovertebral hypertrophy is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: survivorship analysis of Bryan disc for single-level cervical arthroplasty.
    Chung SB; Muradov JM; Lee SH; Eoh W; Kim ES
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):1017-22. PubMed ID: 22421919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ProDisc-C: an in vivo kinematic study.
    Duggal N; Bertagnoli R; Rabin D; Wharton N; Kowalczyk I
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 21150671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A comparative study of anterior decompression approach by using cervical retractor systems and traditional surgical approach to treat cervical spondylosis].
    Yang C; Bi Z; Yuan S; Fu C; Cao Y; Shao M
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 22(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 18575435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.