These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19957465)

  • 1. [Interpretation of research data. Are you also a "statistical analphabet?"].
    Füessl HS
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Oct; 151(44):6-7. PubMed ID: 19957465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Introducing critical statistics analysis in an article].
    Coutant C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Sep; 37(9):765-6. PubMed ID: 19699132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Descriptive statistics in ophthalmic research.
    Yu F; Afifi AA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):389-91. PubMed ID: 19217955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Presentation of statistical date, 1--Tables: more complicated than anticipated].
    Ostermann R; Wilhelm AF; Wolf-Ostermann K
    Pflege Z; 2004 Jan; 57(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 14768162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Put responsibility for statistics education where it belongs].
    Alinaghizadeh H; Johansson SE
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 21-27; 106(43):2782-3; author reply 2783. PubMed ID: 19960910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P-values in research reports.
    Ranstam J
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 16156452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hill J
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18446836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Time to change continuing medical education!].
    Ranstam J; Isberg PE; Gullberg B
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Aug 19-25; 106(34):2070-1. PubMed ID: 19769152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The choice of a margin of error in the calculation of an appropriate sample size in health research.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2009 Jan; 47(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 19743787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Presentation of statistical data in nursing 12: with reflection and estimation].
    Ostermann R; Wilhelm AF; Wolf-Ostermann K
    Pflege Z; 2004 Dec; 57(12):862-4. PubMed ID: 15646111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten common statistical errors and how to avoid them.
    Zinsmeister AR; Connor JT
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 103(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18289193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18286673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-hoc data analysis: benefits and limitations.
    Curran-Everett D; Milgrom H
    Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2013 Jun; 13(3):223-4. PubMed ID: 23571411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current research in biostatistics.
    Afifi AA; Yu F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 20172063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hansen BB
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2050-4; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18407561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Introduction to the topic "Biostatistics and scientific methodology"].
    Hiller E; Weiss P
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1988; 82(18):855-6. PubMed ID: 3213079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical research of kidney diseases III: principles of regression and modelling.
    Ravani P; Parfrey P; Gadag V; Malberti F; Barrett B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3422-30. PubMed ID: 18029371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 5 ways statistics can fool you--tips for practicing clinicians.
    West CP; Dupras DM
    Vaccine; 2013 Mar; 31(12):1550-2. PubMed ID: 23246309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principles: the need for better experimental design.
    Festing MF
    Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2003 Jul; 24(7):341-5. PubMed ID: 12871666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.