These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19957880)

  • 1. Judgment and judgment latency for freedom and responsibility relatedness as a function of subtle linguistic variations.
    Wilkerson K; McGahan JR; Stevens R; Williamson D; Low J
    J Psychol; 2009 Dec; 143(6):641-56. PubMed ID: 19957880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived freedom-responsibility covariation among Cypriot adolescents.
    Frangou G; Wilkerson K; McGahan JR
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Apr; 135(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 18507317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A preliminary study of the effect of imaginary sexual stimulation on the perceived covariation between freedom and responsibility.
    Pryor PL; McGahan JR; Hutto CW; Williamson JD
    J Psychol; 2000 Nov; 134(6):645-58. PubMed ID: 11092418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender differences in the effect of visual sexual stimulation on the perceived covariation between freedom and responsibility.
    Nevala JD; Gray NJ; McGahan JR; Minchew T
    J Psychol; 2006 Mar; 140(2):133-53. PubMed ID: 16770940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The equivalence of contingency structure for intuitive covariation judgments about height, weight, and body fat.
    McGahan JR; McDougal B; Williamson JD; Pryor PL
    J Psychol; 2000 May; 134(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 10907710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism.
    Feltz A; Cokely ET
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):342-50. PubMed ID: 18805023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: studies in the attribution of moral responsibility.
    Woolfolk RL; Doris JM; Darley JM
    Cognition; 2006 Jun; 100(2):283-301. PubMed ID: 16087171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced perceived responsibility decreases metamemory but not memory accuracy in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
    Moritz S; Wahl K; Zurowski B; Jelinek L; Hand I; Fricke S
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Sep; 45(9):2044-52. PubMed ID: 17462589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Truth from language and truth from fit: the impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth.
    Hansen J; Wänke M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1576-88. PubMed ID: 20947772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in naming and semantic abilities with aging from 50 to 90 years.
    Verhaegen C; Poncelet M
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2013 Feb; 19(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 23237304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good things don't come easy (to mind): explaining framing effects in judgments of truth.
    Hilbig BE
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 21768064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Addressing gaps in the maturity of judgment literature: age differences and delinquency.
    Modecki KL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 17546482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How framing statistical statements affects subjective veracity: validation and application of a multinomial model for judgments of truth.
    Hilbig BE
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 22832179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thoughts versus deeds: distal and proximal intent in lay judgments of moral responsibility.
    Plaks JE; McNichols NK; Fortune JL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Dec; 35(12):1687-701. PubMed ID: 19726810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Validation of a scale for responsibility (Salkovskis Responsibility Scale)].
    Bouvard M; Robbe-Grillet P; Milliery M; Pham S; Amireche S; Fanget F; Guerin J; Cottraux J
    Encephale; 2001; 27(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11488253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Future versus present: time perspective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge.
    Nowack K; Milfont TL; van der Meer E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Feb; 87(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 23276650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgments of culpability in a filicide scenario.
    Ferguson CJ; Miller-Stratton H; Heinrich E; Fritz S; Smith S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18158184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Freedom, responsibility, and health.
    Bunker JP; Stansfeld S; Potter J
    BMJ; 1996 Dec 21-28; 313(7072):1582-4. PubMed ID: 8990992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility.
    Roskies A
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):419-23. PubMed ID: 16901745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgments about moral responsibility and determinism in patients with behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: still compatibilists.
    Cova F; Bertoux M; Bourgeois-Gironde S; Dubois B
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):851-64. PubMed ID: 22409859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.