These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19958247)

  • 1. Clinical use of a system for the automated recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in cochlear implant patients.
    Gärtner L; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Büchner A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):724-32. PubMed ID: 19958247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A; van Dijk B; Killian M
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical compound action potentials recorded with automated neural response telemetry: threshold changes as a function of time and electrode position.
    Spivak L; Auerbach C; Vambutas A; Geshkovich S; Wexler L; Popecki B
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 20686409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
    Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants.
    van Dijk B; Botros AM; Battmer RD; Begall K; Dillier N; Hey M; Lai WK; Lenarz T; Laszig R; Morsnowski A; Müller-Deile J; Psarros C; Shallop J; Weber B; Wesarg T; Zarowski A; Offeciers E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 17609616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting.
    Botros A; Psarros C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20124902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
    Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Polak M; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Szkielkowska A; Skarzynski PH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds.
    Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
    Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural network.
    Charasse B; Thai-Van H; Chanal JM; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jul; 31(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 15302088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.