These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19959035)
61. Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Fazio VW; Tekkis PP; Remzi F; Lavery IC Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Dec; 47(12):2015-24. PubMed ID: 15657649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program. Davis CL; Pierce JR; Henderson W; Spencer CD; Tyler C; Langberg R; Swafford J; Felan GS; Kearns MA; Booker B J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 204(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17382213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Dimick JB; Chen SL; Taheri PA; Henderson WG; Khuri SF; Campbell DA J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Oct; 199(4):531-7. PubMed ID: 15454134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Assessment of ACS NSQIP's predictive ability for adverse events after major cancer surgery. Borja-Cacho D; Parsons HM; Habermann EB; Rothenberger DA; Henderson WG; Al-Refaie WB Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):2274-82. PubMed ID: 20585875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe in the high-risk patient: a NSQIP risk-adjusted analysis. McCloskey CA; Wilson MA; Hughes SJ; Eid GM Surgery; 2007 Oct; 142(4):594-7; discussion 597.e1-2. PubMed ID: 17950353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Surgical site infections in a "high outlier" institution: are colorectal surgeons to blame? Wick EC; Vogel JD; Church JM; Remzi F; Fazio VW Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Mar; 52(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 19333034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Comparison between an empirically derived model and the EuroSCORE system in the evaluation of hospital performance: the example of the Italian CABG Outcome Project. D'Errigo P; Seccareccia F; Rosato S; Manno V; Badoni G; Fusco D; Perucci CA; Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Mar; 33(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 18201891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Surgical quality improvement: a simplified method to apply national standards to pediatric trauma care. Leaphart CL; Graham D; Pieper P; Celso BG; Tepas JJ J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Jan; 44(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 19159735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A comparison of 2 surgical site infection monitoring systems. Ju MH; Ko CY; Hall BL; Bosk CL; Bilimoria KY; Wick EC JAMA Surg; 2015 Jan; 150(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25426765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The effect of dead-on-arrival and emergency department death classification on risk-adjusted performance in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Calland JF; Nathens AB; Young JS; Neal ML; Goble S; Abelson J; Fildes JJ; Hemmila MR J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Nov; 73(5):1086-91; discussion 1091-2. PubMed ID: 23117375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Techniques to monitor for endophthalmitis and other cataract surgery complications. Ng JQ; Morlet N; Bremner AP; Bulsara MK; Morton AP; Semmens JB Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan; 115(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 17997486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The choice between different statistical approaches to risk-adjustment influenced the identification of outliers. Fedeli U; Brocco S; Alba N; Rosato R; Spolaore P J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):858-62. PubMed ID: 17606184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Time-of-day effects on surgical outcomes in the private sector: a retrospective cohort study. Kelz RR; Tran TT; Hosokawa P; Henderson W; Paulson EC; Spitz F; Hamilton BH; Hall BL J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Oct; 209(4):434-445.e2. PubMed ID: 19801316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Dimick JB; Richards KE; Raval MV; Fleisher LA; Hall BL; Ko CY J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 21109157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. Merkow RP; Hall BL; Cohen ME; Dimick JB; Wang E; Chow WB; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY J Am Coll Surg; 2012 May; 214(5):822-30. PubMed ID: 22440055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. A new frontier for quality of care in gynecologic oncology surgery: multi-institutional assessment of short-term outcomes for ovarian cancer using a risk-adjusted model. Aletti GD; Santillan A; Eisenhauer EL; Hu J; Aletti G; Podratz KC; Bristow RE; Chi DS; Cliby WA Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 17602726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: the power of hospital collaboration. Campbell DA; Englesbe MJ; Kubus JJ; Phillips LR; Shanley CJ; Velanovich V; Lloyd LR; Hutton MC; Arneson WA; Share DA Arch Surg; 2010 Oct; 145(10):985-91. PubMed ID: 20956768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Adjusted or unadjusted outcomes. Fink AS Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S28-35. PubMed ID: 19874931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. How do (and why should) I use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program? Neumayer L Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S36-40. PubMed ID: 19874933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005-2008. Ozhathil DK; Li Y; Smith JK; Witkowski E; Coyne ER; Alavi K; Tseng JF; Shah SA J Surg Res; 2011 Nov; 171(1):e9-13. PubMed ID: 21872886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]