106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19959192)
1. Virtual pelvic anatomy simulator: a pilot study of usability and perceived effectiveness.
Hassinger JP; Dozois EJ; Holubar SD; Camp JC; Farley DR; Fidler JL; Pawlina W; Robb RA; Larson DW
J Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 161(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 19959192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual pelvic anatomy and surgery simulator: an innovative tool for teaching pelvic surgical anatomy.
Holubar SD; Hassinger JP; Dozois EJ; Camp JC; Farley DR; Fidler JL; Pawlina W; Robb RA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():122-4. PubMed ID: 19377128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual reality: new method of teaching anorectal and pelvic floor anatomy.
Dobson HD; Pearl RK; Orsay CP; Rasmussen M; Evenhouse R; Ai Z; Blew G; Dech F; Edison MI; Silverstein JC; Abcarian H
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Mar; 46(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 12626910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of an experimental paradigm in which to examine human learning using two computer-based formats.
Hoffman HM; Colt HG; Haas A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():187-91. PubMed ID: 11317737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Providing of a virtual simulator perineal anatomy (Pelvic Mentor®) in learning pelvic perineology: results of a preliminary study].
Legendre G; Sahmoune Rachedi L; Descamps P; Fernandez H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jan; 44(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 24854776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of an interactive computer-based method with a conventional reading approach for learning pelvic anatomy.
Corton MM; McIntire DD; Wai CY; Ling FW; Wendel GD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1438-43. PubMed ID: 16996462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a surgical simulator for learning clinical anatomy.
Hariri S; Rawn C; Srivastava S; Youngblood P; Ladd A
Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):896-902. PubMed ID: 15271051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy.
Khot Z; Quinlan K; Norman GR; Wainman B
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 23509000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Minnesota pelvic trainer: a hybrid VR/physical pelvis for providing virtual mentorship.
Konchada V; Shen Y; Burke D; Argun OB; Weinhaus A; Erdman AG; Sweet RM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():280-2. PubMed ID: 21335805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A three-dimensional model of the pelvic floor and anorectal anatomy.
Ruskin MJ; Pearl RK
J Biocommun; 1990; 17(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 2318814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Simulator as a teaching tool for anatomy education.
Solyar A; Cuellar H; Sadoughi B; Olson TR; Fried MP
Am J Surg; 2008 Jul; 196(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18374890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-dimensional sectioned images and three-dimensional surface models for learning the anatomy of the female pelvis.
Shin DS; Jang HG; Hwang SB; Har DH; Moon YL; Chung MS
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 23463707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New views of male pelvic anatomy: role of computer-generated 3D images.
Venuti JM; Imielinska C; Molholt P
Clin Anat; 2004 Apr; 17(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 15042576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The utility of endovascular simulation to improve technical performance and stimulate continued interest of preclinical medical students in vascular surgery.
Lee JT; Qiu M; Teshome M; Raghavan SS; Tedesco MM; Dalman RL
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 20142137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do clinical clerkship students experience simulator-based teaching? A qualitative analysis.
Takayesu JK; Farrell SE; Evans AJ; Sullivan JE; Pawlowski JB; Gordon JA
Simul Healthc; 2006; 1(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 19088592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design principles for developing an efficient clinical anatomy course.
Rizzolo LJ; Stewart WB; O'Brien M; Haims A; Rando W; Abrahams J; Dunne S; Wang S; Aden M
Med Teach; 2006 Mar; 28(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 16707295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Explorable three-dimensional digital model of the female pelvis, pelvic contents, and perineum for anatomical education.
Sergovich A; Johnson M; Wilson TD
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 20166225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships.
Berman N; Fall LH; Smith S; Levine DA; Maloney CG; Potts M; Siegel B; Foster-Johnson L
Acad Med; 2009 Jul; 84(7):942-9. PubMed ID: 19550193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What do dental students think about mandatory laptop programs?
Hendricson W; Eisenberg E; Guest G; Jones P; Johnson L; Panagakos F; McDonald J; Cintron L
J Dent Educ; 2006 May; 70(5):480-99. PubMed ID: 16687633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Software tools for interactive instruction in radiologic anatomy.
Alvarez A; Gold GE; Tobin B; Desser TS
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 16554232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
