169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19959505)
1. Clinical safety and feasibility of a newly developed, simple algorithm for decision-making on neurovascular bundle preservation in radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Hisasue S; Masumori N; Kobayashi K; Kato R; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 40(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19959505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neurovascular bundle resection: does it improve the margins?
Lepor H; Tareen B
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 20219562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Guru KA; Perlmutter AE; Butt ZM; Peabody JO
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):4000-3. PubMed ID: 18405449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lepor H; Kaci L
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 15028445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective analysis of the distance between the neurovascular bundle and prostate cancer foci in radical prostatectomy specimens: its clinical implication in nerve-sparing surgery.
Inoue S; Shiina H; Hiraoka T; Mitsui Y; Sumura M; Urakami S; Igawa M
BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1085-90. PubMed ID: 19388988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. How often do experienced surgeons have positive surgical margins when there is extraprostatic extension in the region of the neurovascular bundle?
Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Tsuzuki T; Carter HB; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):446-9. PubMed ID: 15643199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical modifications of radical retropubic prostatectomy to decrease incidence of positive surgical margins.
Alsikafi NF; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1998 Apr; 159(4):1281-5. PubMed ID: 9507853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Wieder JA; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9679867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality improvement in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer: impact of video documentation review on positive surgical margin.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Saranchuk JW; Hassen WA; Trabulsi EJ; Reuter VE; Guillonneau B
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):765-8. PubMed ID: 15711265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of "extended radical retropubic prostatectomy": a surgical technique for improving margin positive rates in prostate cancer.
Miyake H; Fujimoto H; Komiyama M; Fujisawa M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Mar; 36(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 19897336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Steiner MS
Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate: surgical and functional outcomes.
Menard J; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Yiou R; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 18762050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
