BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19959609)

  • 1. A randomized clinical trial to compare the Goshgarian and Nance palatal arch.
    Stivaros N; Lowe C; Dandy N; Doherty B; Mandall NA
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19959609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: A 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Sandler J; Murray A; Thiruvenkatachari B; Gutierrez R; Speight P; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24974994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nance palatal arch: a cautionary tale.
    Singh P; Cox S
    J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 36(4):272-6. PubMed ID: 19934245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anchorage provided during intra-arch distal molar movement: a comparison between the Nance appliance and a fixed frontal bite plane.
    Bondemark L; Thornéus J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 15898386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
    Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoral maxillary molar distalization.
    Karlsson I; Bondemark L
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 17090171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment.
    Zablocki HL; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):852-60. PubMed ID: 18538249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Modified Nance Palatal Arch for the Treatment of Ectopically Erupting Permanent First Molars.
    Romano FL; Arid J; de Queiroz AM; Bezerra Segato RA; Filho PN
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2016 Sep; 83(3):161-166. PubMed ID: 28327267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distal movement of upper permanent molars using midpalatal mini-implant.
    de Lira Ade L; Prado S; Araújo MT; Sant'Anna EF; Ruellas AC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 18(2):18.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23916446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of unilateral molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance.
    Schütze SF; Gedrange T; Zellmann MR; Harzer W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 May; 131(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 17482078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study.
    Onçağ G; Seçkin O; Dinçer B; Arikan F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 17208102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Haematemesis related to orthodontic treatment with Nance palatal arch: a case report.
    Patini R; Bonetti AA; Camodeca A; Staderini E; Gallenzi P
    J Orthod; 2018 Jun; 45(2):125-128. PubMed ID: 29513094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tooth movement using palatal implant supported anchorage compared to conventional dental anchorage.
    Borsos G; Vokó Z; Gredes T; Kunert-Keil C; Vegh A
    Ann Anat; 2012 Nov; 194(6):556-60. PubMed ID: 23079140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of arch shape on the transverse effects of transpalatal arches of the Goshgarian type during application of buccal root torque.
    Baldini G; Luder HU
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Mar; 81(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 6758595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances.
    Ciambotti C; Ngan P; Durkee M; Kohli K; Kim H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11174532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molar distalization with pendulum appliances in the mixed dentition: effects on the position of unerupted canines and premolars.
    Kinzinger GS; Wehrbein H; Gross U; Diedrich PR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):407-17. PubMed ID: 16527638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.