These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1995967)

  • 1. Reducing tobacco consumption in California: Proposition 99 seems to work.
    Pierce JP; Burns DM; Berry C; Rosbrook B; Goodman J; Gilpin E; Winn D; Bal D
    JAMA; 1991 Mar; 265(10):1257-8. PubMed ID: 1995967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. California's Proposition 99 on tobacco, and its impact.
    Breslow L; Johnson M
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():585-604. PubMed ID: 8323603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of California Proposition 99, a major anti-smoking law, on cigarette consumption.
    Hu TW; Bai J; Keeler TE; Barnett PG; Sung HY
    J Public Health Policy; 1994; 15(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 8027359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in adult cigarette smoking in California compared with the rest of the United States, 1978-1994.
    Siegel M; Mowery PD; Pechacek TP; Strauss WJ; Schooley MW; Merritt RK; Novotny TE; Giovino GA; Eriksen MP
    Am J Public Health; 2000 Mar; 90(3):372-9. PubMed ID: 10705854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The proposed tobacco settlement is not a good deal.
    Allen B
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1998 Jun; 90(6):337-9. PubMed ID: 9640903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of heavy smoking in California and the United States, 1965-2007.
    Pierce JP; Messer K; White MM; Cowling DW; Thomas DP
    JAMA; 2011 Mar; 305(11):1106-12. PubMed ID: 21406647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease.
    Fichtenberg CM; Glantz SA
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Dec; 343(24):1772-7. PubMed ID: 11114317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Education Program.
    Elder JP; Edwards CC; Conway TL; Kenney E; Johnson CA; Bennett ED
    Public Health Rep; 1996; 111(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 8711104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of tobacco-free pharmacy policies on smoking prevalence.
    Jin Y; Lu B; Berman M; Klein EG; Foraker RE; Ferketich AK
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2016; 56(6):627-632. PubMed ID: 27667500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme.
    Pierce JP; White MM; Gilpin EA
    Tob Control; 2005 Jun; 14(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 15923472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tobacco control success versus demographic destiny: examining the causes of the low smoking prevalence in California.
    Warner KE; Mendez D; Alshanqeety O
    Am J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 98(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 18172141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First-year impact of the 1989 California cigarette tax increase on cigarette consumption.
    Flewelling RL; Kenney E; Elder JP; Pierce J; Johnson M; Bal DG
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Jun; 82(6):867-9. PubMed ID: 1585966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A major state tobacco tax increase, the master settlement agreement, and cigarette consumption: the California experience.
    Sung HY; Hu TW; Ong M; Keeler TE; Sheu ML
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Jun; 95(6):1030-5. PubMed ID: 15914829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of a major cigarette price change on smoking behavior in california: a zero-inflated negative binomial model.
    Sheu ML; Hu TW; Keeler TE; Ong M; Sung HY
    Health Econ; 2004 Aug; 13(8):781-91. PubMed ID: 15322990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlling tobacco use.
    Kessler KM
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Jun; 344(23):1798; author reply 1798-9. PubMed ID: 11396460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: results from the California tobacco policy simulation model.
    Levy DT; Hyland A; Higbee C; Remer L; Compton C
    Health Policy; 2007 Jul; 82(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 17055104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secular trends in adolescent never smoking from 1990 to 1999 in California: an age-period-cohort analysis.
    Chen X; Li G; Unger JB; Liu X; Johnson CA
    Am J Public Health; 2003 Dec; 93(12):2099-104. PubMed ID: 14652341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower levels of cigarette consumption found in smoke-free workplaces in California.
    Woodruff TJ; Rosbrook B; Pierce J; Glantz SA
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Jun; 153(12):1485-93. PubMed ID: 8512439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The California Tobacco Control Program and potential harm reduction through reduced cigarette consumption in continuing smokers.
    Gilpin EA; Pierce JP
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2002; 4 Suppl 2():S157-66. PubMed ID: 12583355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing cigarette consumption in California: tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign.
    Hu TW; Sung HY; Keeler TE
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):1218-22. PubMed ID: 7661228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.