BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19959674)

  • 1. Measures for assessing subjective effects of potential reduced-exposure products.
    Hanson K; O'Connor R; Hatsukami D
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Dec; 18(12):3209-24. PubMed ID: 19959674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.
    Hatsukami DK; Hanson K; Briggs A; Parascandola M; Genkinger JM; O'Connor R; Shields PG
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Dec; 18(12):3143-95. PubMed ID: 19959672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.
    Lindson-Hawley N; Hartmann-Boyce J; Fanshawe TR; Begh R; Farley A; Lancaster T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD005231. PubMed ID: 27734465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) for smokeless tobacco users: clinical evaluation methodology.
    Gray JN; Breland AB; Weaver M; Eissenberg T
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2008 Sep; 10(9):1441-8. PubMed ID: 19023835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating oral noncombustible potential-reduced exposure products for smokers.
    Blank MD; Eissenberg T
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2010 Apr; 12(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 20159791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods used in internal industry clinical trials to assess tobacco risk reduction.
    Rees VW; Kreslake JM; O'Connor RJ; Cummings KM; Parascandola M; Hatsukami D; Shields PG; Connolly GN
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Dec; 18(12):3196-208. PubMed ID: 19959673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk.
    Shiffman S; Pillitteri JL; Burton SL; Di Marino ME
    Tob Control; 2004 Mar; 13(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 14985602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the acute effects of oral, non-combustible potential reduced exposure products marketed to smokers.
    Cobb CO; Weaver MF; Eissenberg T
    Tob Control; 2010 Oct; 19(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 19346218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveillance of tobacco industry retail marketing activities of reduced harm products.
    Slater S; Giovino G; Chaloupka F
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2008 Jan; 10(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 18188759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in industry trial testimony.
    Wayne GF
    Tob Control; 2006 Dec; 15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv90-7. PubMed ID: 17130630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of Potentially Reduced Exposure Tobacco Products Among American Indian Smokeless Tobacco Users: Associations With Cessation Behaviors and Cotinine Levels.
    Comiford AL; Rhoades DA; Dvorak JD; Ding K; Mehta T; Spicer P; Wagener T; Doescher MP
    Public Health Rep; 2020 Jan; 135(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 31835016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
    Task Force on Community Preventive Services
    Am J Prev Med; 2001 Feb; 20(2 Suppl):10-5. PubMed ID: 11173214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New tobacco products: do smokers like them?
    Caraballo RS; Pederson LL; Gupta N
    Tob Control; 2006 Feb; 15(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16436404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do adult smokers think about ads and promotional materials for PREPs?
    O'Hegarty M; Richter P; Pederson LL
    Am J Health Behav; 2007; 31(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 17555383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of behavioural, chemical, toxicological and clinical studies of a tobacco heated product glo™ and the potential for bridging from a foundational dataset to new product iterations.
    Goodall S; Gale N; Thorne D; Hadley S; Prasad K; Gilmour I; Miazzi F; Proctor C
    Toxicol Rep; 2022; 9():1426-1442. PubMed ID: 36561950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.
    Carter LP; Stitzer ML; Henningfield JE; O'Connor RJ; Cummings KM; Hatsukami DK
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Dec; 18(12):3241-62. PubMed ID: 19959676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomonitoring of inhaled complex mixtures--ambient air, diesel exhaust and cigarette smoke.
    Scherer G
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2005 Jul; 57 Suppl 1():75-110. PubMed ID: 16092718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Harm reduction strategy in tobacco control].
    Gorini G
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(3-4 Suppl 1):19-32. PubMed ID: 21926451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Governments must agree unified approach to use of e-cigarettes, report says.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f3537. PubMed ID: 23723461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
    Baxi R; Sharma M; Roseby R; Polnay A; Priest N; Waters E; Spencer N; Webster P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD001746. PubMed ID: 24671922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.