These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19959946)

  • 1. A simple algorithm for solving the inverse problem of interpretation of uncertain individual measurements in internal dosimetry.
    Molokanov A; Chojnacki E; Blanchardon E
    Health Phys; 2010 Jan; 98(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 19959946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties in internal dosimetry.
    Puncher M; Birchall A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18806256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainties in internal doses calculated for Mayak workers--a study of 63 cases.
    Miller G; Guilmette R; Bertelli L; Waters T; Romanov SA; Zaytseva YV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 18689802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian internal dosimetry calculations using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
    Miller G; Martz HF; Little TT; Guilmette R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 11926369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obtaining an unbiased estimate of intake in routine monitoring when the time of intake is unknown.
    Puncher M; Marsh JW; Birchall A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 16410294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainties in doses from intakes of radionuclides assessed from monitoring measurements.
    Etherington G; Birchall A; Puncher M; Molokanov A; Blanchardon E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 17135426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of uncertainties into internal contamination monitoring.
    Davesne E; Casanova P; Chojnacki E; Paquet F; Blanchardon E
    Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 20838093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating uncertainty on internal dose assessments.
    Puncher M; Birchall A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17993651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainties analysis for the plutonium dosimetry model, doses-2005, using Mayak bioassay data.
    Bess JD; Krahenbuhl MP; Miller SC; Slaughter DM; Khokhryakov VV; Khokhryakov VF; Suslova KG; Vostrotin VV
    Health Phys; 2007 Sep; 93(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 17693771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimisation of internal contamination monitoring programme by integration of uncertainties.
    Davesne E; Casanova P; Chojnacki E; Paquet F; Blanchardon E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):361-6. PubMed ID: 21037264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quantification of uncertainties in internal doses assessed from monitoring measurements.
    Etherington G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17237184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo evaluated parameters for internal dosimetry.
    Gualdrini G; Ferrari P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):157-60. PubMed ID: 17553866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of multi-compartment wound models to plutonium-contaminated wounds incurred by former workers at rocky flats.
    Falk RB; Daugherty NM; Aldrich JM; Furman FJ; Hilmas DE
    Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2):128-43. PubMed ID: 16832194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IMPDOS (improved dosimetry and risk assessment for plutonium-induced diseases): internal dosimetry software tools developed for the Mayak worker study.
    Miller G; Bertelli L; Guilmette R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 18658175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum detectable annual dose calculation for routine individual monitoring programme in case of plutonium and uranium contamination of the workplace.
    Molokanov AA; Kukhta BA; Yatsenko VN; Bolshakova LI
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):419-22. PubMed ID: 21068022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability and uncertainty of biokinetic model parameters: the discrete empirical Bayes approximation.
    Miller G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 18689801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The application of Bayesian techniques in the interpretation of bioassay data.
    Miller G; Little T; Guilmette R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):333-8. PubMed ID: 14526981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian approach for quantifying the uncertainty of neutron doses derived from spectrometric measurements.
    Reginatto M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 16877470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of early Los Alamos internal exposures to plutonium.
    Miller G; Bertelli L; Guilmette R; McNaughton MW; Eisele WF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 18375946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.