318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19960157)
1. Dealing with returned manuscripts.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Nov; 50(11):1050-2; quiz 1053. PubMed ID: 19960157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication.
Pierson DJ
Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 15447812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.
Dowd SB; McElveny C
Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.
Happell B
Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 21853889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
Lamb CR; Mai W
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preparing a manuscript for submission.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):759-61; quiz 762. PubMed ID: 19710971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Writing for scientific medical manuscript: a guide for preparing manuscript submitted to biomedical journals.
Setiati S; Harimurti K
Acta Med Indones; 2007; 39(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 17297211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.
Bordage G
Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):889-96. PubMed ID: 11553504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Case reports in respiratory care.
Pierson DJ
Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1186-94. PubMed ID: 15447801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Author perception of peer review.
Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
