336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19961171)
1. Life cycle emissions and cost of producing electricity from coal, natural gas, and wood pellets in Ontario, Canada.
Zhang Y; McKechnie J; Cormier D; Lyng R; Mabee W; Ogino A; Maclean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):538-44. PubMed ID: 19961171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.
McKechnie J; Colombo S; Chen J; Mabee W; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):789-95. PubMed ID: 21142063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.
Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energetic valorization of wood waste: estimation of the reduction in CO2 emissions.
Vanneste J; Van Gerven T; Vander Putten E; Van der Bruggen B; Helsen L
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3595-602. PubMed ID: 21719072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.
MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Densified biomass can cost-effectively mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and address energy security in thermal applications.
Wilson TO; McNeal FM; Spatari S; G Abler D; Adler PR
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1270-7. PubMed ID: 22107056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China.
Zhao W; van der Voet E; Zhang Y; Huppes G
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(5):1517-26. PubMed ID: 19068268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mercury emissions during cofiring of sub-bituminous coal and biomass (chicken waste, wood, coffee residue, and tobacco stalk) in a laboratory-scale fluidized bed combustor.
Cao Y; Zhou H; Fan J; Zhao H; Zhou T; Hack P; Chan CC; Liou JC; Pan WP
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Dec; 42(24):9378-84. PubMed ID: 19174919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.
Abrahams LS; Samaras C; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3237-45. PubMed ID: 25650513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
Robinson AL; Rhodes JS; Keith DW
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Production of bio-synthetic natural gas in Canada.
Hacatoglu K; McLellan PJ; Layzell DB
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 20175525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. electricity generation scenarios.
Brown KE; Henze DK; Milford JB
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3065-72. PubMed ID: 23465362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.
Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8182-9. PubMed ID: 21846117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of pipeline versus truck transport of bio-oil.
Pootakham T; Kumar A
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(1):414-21. PubMed ID: 19699637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biofuel Options for Marine Applications: Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Analyses.
Tan ECD; Hawkins TR; Lee U; Tao L; Meyer PA; Wang M; Thompson T
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 55(11):7561-7570. PubMed ID: 33998807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The climate impacts of bioenergy systems depend on market and regulatory policy contexts.
Lemoine DM; Plevin RJ; Cohn AS; Jones AD; Brandt AR; Vergara SE; Kammen DM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7347-50. PubMed ID: 20873876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
