These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19961750)

  • 1. [An efficacy comparison between mini-screw implant and transpalatal arch on dentofacial morphology in extraction cases].
    Liu YH; Liu J; Li Q; Ding WH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):454-9. PubMed ID: 19961750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of treatment results between implant anchorage and traditional intraoral anchorage in patients with maxillary protrusion].
    Ma N; Li WR; Chen XH; Zheng X
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 25(4):475-480. PubMed ID: 27858074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion.
    Liu YH; Ding WH; Liu J; Li Q
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 36(9):687-95. PubMed ID: 19602104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of intrusion arches and mini-implant systems in deepbite patients.
    Senışık NE; Türkkahraman H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):723-33. PubMed ID: 22640674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrusion of maxillary incisors by mini-screw anchorage of Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion cases.
    Al-Falahi BA; Hammad SM; El-Kenawy MH; Fouda MA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 23413639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consecutive use of mini-implants in the palate to treat skeletal maxillary constriction and Class II malocclusion in an adult case.
    Kayalar E; Batu-Guney A; Marsan G; Firatli S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1624-1627. PubMed ID: 33221792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical outcome evaluation of midpalatal mini-implant anchorage system in orthodontic treatment].
    Pan YC; Zhao JH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Dec; 46(6):969-74. PubMed ID: 25512294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cephalometric analysis of implant anchorage-assisted retraction of anterior teeth].
    Xu YL; Fang B; Mao LX; Feng YM; Xia YH; Lou XT; Wu Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Feb; 17(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18360662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Long-term effect of intruded upper molars and dental implant restoration in 24 patients].
    Wang Y; Zhang XJ; Yin CR; Deng Y; Wang WC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Aug; 27(4):430-432. PubMed ID: 30483716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Intruding upper incisors using mini-screw anchorage in patients with gummy smile].
    Li YY; Zhou YH; Lin JX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):449-53. PubMed ID: 19961749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage.
    de Lima Araújo LH; Zenóbio EG; Pacheco W; Cosso MG; Manzi FR; Shibli JA
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 16(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 21274732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants.
    Paccini JV; Cotrim-Ferreira FA; Ferreira FV; Freitas KM; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):56-66. PubMed ID: 27409654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Stability of upper molars with the application of implant anchorage].
    Zhu SJ; Zhou YH; Fu MK
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 16620616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary molar intrusion with micro-implant anchorage (MIA).
    Park HS; Jang BK; Kyung HM
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 16429869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical evaluation of implant anchorage for molar intrusion: report of the short-term results].
    Mao LX; Wu Y; Fang B; Zhang ZY; Huang W; Lou XT; Feng YM; Xia YH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Oct; 16(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 18004475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.