BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19961887)

  • 1. European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries.
    Verbeke W; Van Wezemael L; de Barcellos MD; Kügler JO; Hocquette JF; Ueland Ø; Grunert KG
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 19961887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
    Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef.
    Banović M; Grunert KG; Barreira MM; Fontes MA
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20374754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of technology information on consumer expectations and liking of beef.
    Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Rødbotten R; De Smet S; Scholderer J; Verbeke W
    Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 21981934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety.
    Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Verbeke W
    Meat Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21543160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meat standards and grading: a world view.
    Polkinghorne RJ; Thompson JM
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):227-35. PubMed ID: 20541325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One technology does not fit all: profiling consumers of tender and tenderised beef steaks.
    Almli VL; Van Wezemael L; Verbeke W; Ueland Ø
    Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):361-70. PubMed ID: 23273438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system.
    Legrand I; Hocquette JF; Polkinghorne RJ; Pethick DW
    Animal; 2013 Mar; 7(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 23031268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability.
    Hocquette JF; Van Wezemael L; Chriki S; Legrand I; Verbeke W; Farmer L; Scollan ND; Polkinghorne R; Rødbotten R; Allen P; Pethick DW
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 24035246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the near-infrared system to sort various beef middle and end muscle cuts into tenderness categories.
    Price DM; Hilton GG; VanOverbeke DL; Morgan JB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):413-8. PubMed ID: 17965325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
    Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variables affecting the propensity to buy branded beef among groups of Australian beef buyers.
    Morales LE; Griffith G; Wright V; Fleming E; Umberger W; Hoang N
    Meat Sci; 2013 Jun; 94(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 23501257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review: Beef-eating quality: a European journey.
    Farmer LJ; Farrell DT
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2424-2433. PubMed ID: 30004320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality.
    Hocquette JF; Botreau R; Picard B; Jacquet A; Pethick DW; Scollan ND
    Meat Sci; 2012 Nov; 92(3):197-209. PubMed ID: 22554471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride to beef and calf-fed Holstein cattle on consumer palatability ratings.
    Mehaffey JM; Brooks JC; Rathmann RJ; Alsup EM; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Yates DA; Johnson BJ; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3712-21. PubMed ID: 19717772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production.
    Nielsen HB; Sonne AM; Grunert KG; Banati D; Pollák-Tóth A; Lakner Z; Olsen NV; Zontar TP; Peterman M
    Appetite; 2009 Feb; 52(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 18845196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers.
    Oliver MA; Nute GR; Font I Furnols M; San Julián R; Campo MM; Sañudo C; Cañeque V; Guerrero L; Alvarez I; Díaz MT; Branscheid W; Wicke M; Montossi F
    Meat Sci; 2006 Nov; 74(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 22063047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Consumer expectations concerning the quality of food from animals].
    Pudel V
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1994 Jul; 101(7):255-8. PubMed ID: 7924957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.