901 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19961996)
1. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal fit of Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(5):398-9. PubMed ID: 18950059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Gonzalo E; Pelaez J; Serrano B; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.
Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen J
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18620749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study.
Raigrodski AJ; Chiche GJ; Potiket N; Hochstedler JL; Mohamed SE; Billiot S; Mercante DE
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 17052467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Pelaez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Serrano JF; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 22930766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings.
Iwai T; Komine F; Kobayashi K; Saito A; Matsumura H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 18607834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic.
Ortega R; Gonzalo E; Gomez-Polo M; Suárez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 26340011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Reich S; Kappe K; Teschner H; Schmitt J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.
Sailer I; Gottnerb J; Kanelb S; Hammerle CH
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 19918588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
