907 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19961996)
21. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems.
Stappert CF; Dai M; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Br Dent J; 2004 Jun; 196(12):766-70; discussion 760, quiz 780. PubMed ID: 15220983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of metal selection and porcelain firing on the marginal accuracy of titanium-based metal ceramic restorations.
Shokry TE; Attia M; Mosleh I; Elhosary M; Hamza T; Shen C
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 20105684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns.
Jesús Suárez M; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 16220803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of gingival ceramic veneer thickness on the fracture strength of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.
Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Farhan D; Becker F; Rammelsberg P
Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 20718211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study.
Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Augthun M; Spiekermann H
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 11484570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks.
Zaghloul HH; Younis JF
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23964776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of CAM vs. CAD/CAM scanning methods and finish line of tooth preparation in the vertical misfit of zirconia bridge structures.
Castillo de Oyagüe R; Sánchez-Jorge MI; Sánchez Turrión A; Monticelli F; Toledano M; Osorio R
Am J Dent; 2009 Apr; 22(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 19626969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
