352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19962268)
1. The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a comparison to conventional imaging techniques.
Aukema TS; Rutgers EJ; Vogel WV; Teertstra HJ; Oldenburg HS; Vrancken Peeters MT; Wesseling J; Russell NS; Valdés Olmos RA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19962268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma.
Manohar K; Mittal BR; Senthil R; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Singh G
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 22334135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma: a comparison to conventional imaging.
Gallowitsch HJ; Kresnik E; Gasser J; Kumnig G; Igerc I; Mikosch P; Lind P
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 12750613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of metastases from postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison between FDG and FLT PET/CT studies.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kajiya Y; Tanabe H; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Koriyama C
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):891-901. PubMed ID: 23468571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole-body
Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography finds answers in cancer patients with increasing tumor markers and negative or equivocal conventional imaging modalities.
Salem SS; Shahin MA
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Mar; 33(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 22237387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography for the postoperative surveillance of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Park JW; Jo MK; Lee HM
BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 19007371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT.
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Haug A; Heinemann V; Bauerfeind I; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 18082989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical value of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after potentially curative surgery: experience with 241 patients.
Kanzaki R; Higashiyama M; Maeda J; Okami J; Hosoki T; Hasegawa Y; Takami M; Kodama K
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 20197344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The compared study in detecting the recurrence and metastases of breast cancer patients post treatment between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and conventional workup].
Zhang WG; Wang GH; Zhang WD; Fan W; Li J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 May; 93(19):1446-9. PubMed ID: 24029564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Pretreatment Combined (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Staging on Radiation Therapy Treatment Decisions in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Ng SP; David S; Alamgeer M; Ganju V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Sep; 93(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 26279029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple (18)F-FDG, PET-CT for postoperative monitoring of breast cancer patients.
Kurata A; Murata Y; Kubota K; Osanai T; Shibuya H
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):979-83. PubMed ID: 19863406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical significance of FDG-PET/CT at the postoperative surveillance in the breast cancer patients.
Jung NY; Yoo IR; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Chae BJ; Seo YY
Breast Cancer; 2016 Jan; 23(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 24872087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of locoregional and distant recurrences in breast cancer patients by using FDG PET.
Eubank WB; Mankoff DA; Vesselle HJ; Eary JF; Schubert EK; Dunnwald LK; Lindsley SK; Gralow JR; Austin-Seymour MM; Ellis GK; Livingston RB
Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 11796893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer with FDG-PET in patients with progressive elevation of serum tumor markers.
Suárez M; Pérez-Castejón MJ; Jiménez A; Domper M; Ruiz G; Montz R; Carreras JL
Q J Nucl Med; 2002 Jun; 46(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 12114874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions?
Casneuf V; Delrue L; Kelles A; Van Damme N; Van Huysse J; Berrevoet F; De Vos M; Duyck P; Peeters M
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2007; 70(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18330088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary tumor visualization and staging in T1 breast cancer.
Koolen BB; van der Leij F; Vogel WV; Rutgers EJ; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Elkhuizen PH; Valdés Olmos RA
Acta Oncol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 23672678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of FDG PET/CT for the Optimization of the Management of Additional Lesions Detected on Local Staging Breast MRI.
Jalaguier-Coudray A; Delarbre B; Brenot-Rossi I; Houvenaeghel G; Villard-Mahjoub R; Viens P; Thomassin-Naggara I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):891-900. PubMed ID: 27003055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ovarian cancer recurrence: role of whole-body positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose.
Torizuka T; Nobezawa S; Kanno T; Futatsubashi M; Yoshikawa E; Okada H; Takekuma M; Maeda M; Ouchi Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Jun; 29(6):797-803. PubMed ID: 12029554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole-body FDG positron emission tomographic imaging for staging esophageal cancer comparison with computed tomography.
Meltzer CC; Luketich JD; Friedman D; Charron M; Strollo D; Meehan M; Urso GK; Dachille MA; Townsend DW
Clin Nucl Med; 2000 Nov; 25(11):882-7. PubMed ID: 11079584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
