BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19963602)

  • 1. Comparison and unification of genomic signatures in breast cancer.
    Blazadonakis ME; Zervakis ME
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3869-72. PubMed ID: 19963602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complementary gene signature integration in multiplatform microarray experiments.
    Blazadonakis ME; Zervakis ME; Kafetzopoulos D
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 Jan; 15(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 20813648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expression genomics in breast cancer research: microarrays at the crossroads of biology and medicine.
    Miller LD; Liu ET
    Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(2):206. PubMed ID: 17397520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fuzzy logic selection as a new reliable tool to identify molecular grade signatures in breast cancer--the INNODIAG study.
    Kempowsky-Hamon T; Valle C; Lacroix-Triki M; Hedjazi L; Trouilh L; Lamarre S; Labourdette D; Roger L; Mhamdi L; Dalenc F; Filleron T; Favre G; François JM; Le Lann MV; Anton-Leberre V
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Feb; 8():3. PubMed ID: 25888889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER).
    Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; van Harten WH; Retel VP; van 't Veer LJ; van Dam FS; Karsenberg K; Douma KF; van Tinteren H; Peterse JL; Wesseling J; Wu TS; Atsma D; Rutgers EJ; Brink G; Floore AN; Glas AM; Roumen RM; Bellot FE; van Krimpen C; Rodenhuis S; van de Vijver MJ; Linn SC
    Lancet Oncol; 2007 Dec; 8(12):1079-1087. PubMed ID: 18042430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genes and functions from breast cancer signatures.
    Huang S; Murphy L; Xu W
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):473. PubMed ID: 29699511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved breast cancer prognosis through the combination of clinical and genetic markers.
    Sun Y; Goodison S; Li J; Liu L; Farmerie W
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 17130137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple but highly effective approach to evaluate the prognostic performance of gene expression signatures.
    Starmans MH; Fung G; Steck H; Wouters BG; Lambin P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28320. PubMed ID: 22163293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of sample size on robustness and prediction accuracy of a prognostic gene signature.
    Kim SY
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 10():147. PubMed ID: 19445687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An algorithm to discover gene signatures with predictive potential.
    Hallett RM; Dvorkin A; Gabardo CM; Hassell JA
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Sep; 29(1):120. PubMed ID: 20813028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-study projections of genomic biomarkers: an evaluation in cancer genomics.
    Lucas JE; Carvalho CM; Chen JL; Chi JT; West M
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(2):e4523. PubMed ID: 19225561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer genomics: real-time use.
    Bertucci F; Birnbaum D
    Lancet Oncol; 2007 Dec; 8(12):1045-1047. PubMed ID: 18054870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From description to causality: mechanisms of gene expression signatures in cancer.
    Adler AS; Chang HY
    Cell Cycle; 2006 Jun; 5(11):1148-51. PubMed ID: 16721055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hunting for robust gene signature from cancer profiling data: sources of variability, different interpretations, and recent methodological developments.
    Xu JZ; Wong CW
    Cancer Lett; 2010 Oct; 296(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 20579805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Derivation of cancer diagnostic and prognostic signatures from gene expression data.
    Goodison S; Sun Y; Urquidi V
    Bioanalysis; 2010 May; 2(5):855-62. PubMed ID: 21083217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NETBAGs: a network-based clustering approach with gene signatures for cancer subtyping analysis.
    Wu L; Liu Z; Xu J; Chen M; Fang H; Tong W; Xiao W
    Biomark Med; 2015; 9(11):1053-65. PubMed ID: 26501477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of gene signatures using biological knowledge.
    Blazadonakis ME; Zervakis ME; Kafetzopoulos D
    Artif Intell Med; 2011 Sep; 53(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 21767937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of microarray breast cancer classification under feature variability.
    Sontrop HM; Moerland PD; van den Ham R; Reinders MJ; Verhaegh WF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 10():389. PubMed ID: 19941644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of gene expression profile signatures in early-stage breast cancer.
    Desmedt C; Sotiriou C; Piccart-Gebhart MJ
    Cancer Invest; 2009 Jan; 27(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19191098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing molecular signatures for predicting prostate cancer recurrence.
    Sun Y; Goodison S
    Prostate; 2009 Jul; 69(10):1119-27. PubMed ID: 19343730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.