BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19963647)

  • 21. A phantom for investigation of tumour signal and noise in PET reconstruction with various smoothing filters: experiments and comparisons with simulated intensity diffusion.
    Skretting A; Glomset O; Bogsrud TV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):191-4. PubMed ID: 20176733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximum a posteriori reconstruction of the Patlak parametric image from sinograms in dynamic PET.
    Wang G; Fu L; Qi J
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):593-604. PubMed ID: 18199904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. PET transmission tomography using a novel nonlocal MRF prior.
    Chen Y; Hao L; Ye X; Chen W; Luo L; Yin X
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Dec; 33(8):623-33. PubMed ID: 19717279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of Resolution and Noise Properties of Nonquadratically Regularized Image Reconstruction Methods for PET.
    Ahn S; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 18334436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Tsallis entropy-based prior for PET reconstruction].
    Gao Y; Lu L; Ma J; Bian Z; Lu Q; Cao L; Gao S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 30(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 23865299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of noise in full Monte Carlo ML-EM and dual matrix reconstructions in positron emission tomography.
    Rehfeld N; Alber M
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3498-507. PubMed ID: 17022246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improved quantitation for PET/CT image reconstruction with system modeling and anatomical priors.
    Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4095-103. PubMed ID: 17153389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Compressed sensing for reduction of noise and artefacts in direct PET image reconstruction.
    Richter D; Basse-Lüsebrink TC; Kampf T; Fischer A; Israel I; Schneider M; Jakob PM; Samnick S
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 23756331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET.
    Belhassen S; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1309-24. PubMed ID: 20384268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new convex edge-preserving median prior with applications to tomography.
    Hsiao IT; Rangarajan A; Gindi G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 May; 22(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 12846427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multigrid tomographic inversion with variable resolution data and image spaces.
    Oh S; Bouman CA; Webb KJ
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2006 Sep; 15(9):2805-19. PubMed ID: 16948324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultra fast symmetry and SIMD-based projection-backprojection (SSP) algorithm for 3-D PET image reconstruction.
    Hong IK; Chung ST; Kim HK; Kim YB; Son YD; Cho ZH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):789-803. PubMed ID: 17679330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tracer kinetics guided dynamic PET reconstruction.
    Tong S; Shi P
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2007; 20():421-33. PubMed ID: 17633718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a new gridding method for fully 3D direct Fourier PET reconstruction based on a two-plane geometry.
    Bouallègue FB; Crouzet JF; Mariano-Goulart D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Oct; 32(7):580-9. PubMed ID: 18692361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastases of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG-PET/CT by optimizing the iteration number for the image reconstruction.
    Inoue K; Sato T; Kitamura H; Ito M; Tsunoda Y; Hirayama A; Kurosawa H; Tanaka T; Fukushi M; Moriyama N; Fujii H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 18670852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations.
    Wilson DW; Tsui BM; Barrett HH
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 May; 39(5):847-71. PubMed ID: 15552089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An ordered-subsets proximal preconditioned gradient algorithm for edge-preserving PET image reconstruction.
    Mehranian A; Rahmim A; Ay MR; Kotasidis F; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):052503. PubMed ID: 23635293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies.
    Reilhac A; Tomeï S; Buvat I; Michel C; Keheren F; Costes N
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):359-68. PubMed ID: 17920931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Supersampling in PET. A concept for improvement of the resolution of positron emission tomography.
    Assentoft JE; Thomsen JS; Andreasen A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3622-5. PubMed ID: 21096846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.