These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19963667)

  • 1. Myometrium electromechanical modeling for internal uterine pressure estimation by electrohysterography.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6259-62. PubMed ID: 19963667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between electrohysterogram and internal uterine pressure: a preliminary study.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Aelen P; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1661-4. PubMed ID: 17946058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering.
    Skowronski MD; Harris JG; Marossero DE; Edwards RK; Euliano TY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1983-9. PubMed ID: 17019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New electrohysterogram-based estimators of intrauterine pressure signal, tonus and contraction peak for non-invasive labor monitoring.
    Benalcazar-Parra C; Garcia-Casado J; Ye-Lin Y; Alberola-Rubio J; Lopez Á; Perales-Marin A; Prats-Boluda G
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(8):085003. PubMed ID: 31370050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
    Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-complexity intrauterine pressure estimation using the Teager energy operator on electrohysterographic recordings.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Aarts RM; Mischi M
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1215-28. PubMed ID: 24853038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
    Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: evidence of increased in synchronization with term.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6296-9. PubMed ID: 19963919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour.
    Jacod BC; Graatsma EM; Van Hagen E; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-complexity intrauterine pressure monitoring by Teager energy estimation.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Aarts RM; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7424-7. PubMed ID: 24111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrohysterographic analysis of uterine contraction propagation with labor progression: a preliminary study.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4135-8. PubMed ID: 18002912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
    de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical analysis of electrohysterographic methods for continuous monitoring of intrauterine pressure.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Apr; 17(4):3019-3039. PubMed ID: 32987514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.