These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19963881)

  • 21. Technical evaluation of robotic tele-cholecystectomy: a randomized single-blind controlled pilot study.
    Ebihara Y; Hirano S; Takano H; Kanno T; Kawashima K; Morohashi H; Oki E; Hakamada K; Urushidani S; Mori M
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 36602754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient specific surgical simulator for the evaluation of the movability of bimanual robotic arms.
    Moglia A; Turini G; Ferrari V; Ferrari M; Mosca F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():379-85. PubMed ID: 21335823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Manipulation of a master manipulator with a combined-grip-handle of pinch and power grips.
    Jeong S; Tadano K
    Int J Med Robot; 2020 Apr; 16(2):e2065. PubMed ID: 31830365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Action- and workflow-driven augmented reality for computer-aided medical procedures.
    Navab N; Traub J; Sielhorst T; Feuerstein M; Bichlmeier C
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2007; 27(5):10-4. PubMed ID: 17913019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Robotics in general surgery: personal experience, critical analysis and prospectives].
    Fracastoro G; Borzellino G; Castelli A; Fiorini P
    Chir Ital; 2005; 57(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 16400762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lapabot: a compact telesurgical robot system for minimally invasive surgery: part II. Telesurgery evaluation.
    Park JW; Lee DH; Kim YW; Lee BH; Jo YH
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2012 May; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21815881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based telesurgery.
    Nguan CY; Morady R; Wang C; Harrison D; Browning D; Rayman R; Luke PP
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Mar; 4(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18265415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tele-3-dimensional computer-assisted functional endoscopic sinus surgery: new dimension in the surgery of the nose and paranasal sinuses.
    Klapan I; Simicić L; Risavi R; Besenski N; Pasarić K; Gortan D; Janjanin S; Pavić D
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Dec; 127(6):549-57. PubMed ID: 12501107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Robotic and telerobotic surgical systems for abdominal surgery].
    Córdova Dupeyrat A; Ballantyne GH
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2003; 23(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 12768216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.
    Mouraviev V; Klein M; Schommer E; Thiel DD; Samavedi S; Kumar A; Leveillee RJ; Thomas R; Pow-Sang JM; Su LM; Mui E; Smith R; Patel V
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26753619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tele-surgical simulation system for training in the use of da Vinci surgery.
    Suzuki S; Suzuki N; Hayashibe M; Hattori A; Konishi K; Kakeji Y; Hashizume M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():543-8. PubMed ID: 15718794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The virtual university applied to telesurgery: from tele-education to telemanipulation].
    Marescaux J; Mutter D; Soler L; Vix M; Leroy J
    Chirurgie; 1999 Jun; 124(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 10429296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of control modes of a hand-held robot for laparoscopic surgery.
    Tonet O; Focacci F; Piccigallo M; Cavallo F; Uematsu M; Megali G; Dario P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):429-36. PubMed ID: 17354919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Motion generation of robotic surgical tasks: learning from expert demonstrations.
    Reiley CE; Plaku E; Hager GD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():967-70. PubMed ID: 21096982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel virtual reality environment for preoperative planning and simulation of image guided intracardiac surgeries with robotic manipulators.
    Yeniaras E; Deng Z; Syed MA; Davies MG; Tsekos NV
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():716-22. PubMed ID: 21335887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shared control of a medical robot with haptic guidance.
    Xiong L; Chng CB; Chui CK; Yu P; Li Y
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 27314590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A one-DOF freehand haptic device for robotic tele-echography.
    Marchal M; Troccaz J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():231-3. PubMed ID: 15544277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Human/robotic interaction: vision limits performance in simulated vitreoretinal surgery.
    de Smet MD; de Jonge N; Iannetta D; Faridpooya K; van Oosterhout E; Naus G; Meenink TCM; Mura M; Beelen MJ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 97(7):672-678. PubMed ID: 30588753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
    Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.