These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19964023)

  • 1. Measurement of the attenuation coefficient for monodisperse populations of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Gong Y; Cabodi M; Porter TM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1964-6. PubMed ID: 19964023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Freeze-Dried Microfluidic Monodisperse Microbubbles as a New Generation of Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Soysal U; Azevedo PN; Bureau F; Aubry A; Carvalho MS; Pessoa ACSN; Torre LG; Couture O; Tourin A; Fink M; Tabeling P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1484-1495. PubMed ID: 35568594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
    Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic bubble sorting for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
    Segers T; Versluis M
    Lab Chip; 2014 May; 14(10):1705-14. PubMed ID: 24651248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
    Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved Sensitivity of Ultrasound-Based Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation Using Monodisperse Microbubbles.
    van Hoeve W; de Vargas Serrano M; Te Winkel L; Forsberg F; Dave JK; Sarkar K; Wessner CE; Eisenbrey JR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1781-1789. PubMed ID: 34724241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attenuation and size distribution measurements of Definity and manipulated Definity populations.
    Goertz DE; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1376-88. PubMed ID: 17521801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation of noninvasive blood pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Li F; Wang L; Fan Y; Li D
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):715-26. PubMed ID: 22547282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controllable Formation of Monodisperse Polymer Microbubbles as Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Song R; Peng C; Xu X; Wang J; Yu M; Hou Y; Zou R; Yao S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 May; 10(17):14312-14320. PubMed ID: 29637761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation.
    Lin H; Chen J; Chen C
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Sep; 54(9):1317-30. PubMed ID: 27016369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound assessment of translation of microbubbles driven by acoustic radiation force in a channel filled with stationary fluid.
    Yoshida K; Saito K; Omura M; Tamura K; Yamaguchi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2335. PubMed ID: 31672000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of acoustic properties of PVA-shelled ultrasound contrast agents: linear properties (part I).
    Grishenkov D; Pecorari C; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1127-38. PubMed ID: 19427099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Engineering Theranostic Microbubbles Using Microfluidics for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: A Review.
    Pulsipher KW; Hammer DA; Lee D; Sehgal CM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2441-2460. PubMed ID: 30241729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic super-resolution with ultrasound and microbubbles.
    Viessmann OM; Eckersley RJ; Christensen-Jeffries K; Tang MX; Dunsby C
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6447-58. PubMed ID: 23999099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A non-linear ultrasonic scattering approach for micro bubble concentration quantification.
    Mari JM; Hibbs K; Tang M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():2183-6. PubMed ID: 18002422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bubble sorting in pinched microchannels for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
    Kok MP; Segers T; Versluis M
    Lab Chip; 2015; 15(18):3716-22. PubMed ID: 26223966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Production of microbubbles for use as echo contrast agents.
    Butler BD
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1986 Jun; 14(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 3088062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study on the lifetime and attenuation properties of microbubbles coated with carboxylic acid salts.
    Soetanto K; Chan M
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Nov; 38(10):969-77. PubMed ID: 11106009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of Generating Submicrometer Phase-Shift Perfluorocarbon Droplets for Applications in Medical Ultrasonography.
    Sheeran PS; Matsuura N; Borden MA; Williams R; Matsunaga TO; Burns PN; Dayton PA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):252-263. PubMed ID: 27775902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of low-frequency ultrasound and microbubbles on angiogenesis-associated proteins in subcutaneous tumors of nude mice.
    Shen ZY; Shen E; Zhang JZ; Bai WK; Wang Y; Yang SL; Nan SL; Lin YD; Li Y; Hu B
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Aug; 30(2):842-50. PubMed ID: 23707983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.