150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19964234)
1. Realistic simulation of transcranial direct current stimulation via 3-d high-resolution finite element analysis: Effect of tissue anisotropy.
Suh HS; Kim SH; Lee WH; Kim TS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():638-41. PubMed ID: 19964234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.
Metwally MK; Han SM; Kim TS
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Oct; 53(10):1085-101. PubMed ID: 25940845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.
Wagner T; Fregni F; Fecteau S; Grodzinsky A; Zahn M; Pascual-Leone A
Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1113-24. PubMed ID: 17337213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling transcranial DC stimulation.
Oostendorp TF; Hengeveld YA; Wolters CH; Stinstra J; van Elswijk G; Stegeman DF
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4226-9. PubMed ID: 19163645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcranial current brain stimulation (tCS): models and technologies.
Ruffini G; Wendling F; Merlet I; Molaee-Ardekani B; Mekonnen A; Salvador R; Soria-Frisch A; Grau C; Dunne S; Miranda PC
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 May; 21(3):333-45. PubMed ID: 22949089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced spatial focality of electrical field in tDCS with ring electrodes due to tissue anisotropy.
Suh HS; Lee WH; Cho YS; Kim JH; Kim TS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2053-6. PubMed ID: 21096150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation and transcranial pulsed current stimulation: a computer based high-resolution modeling study.
Datta A; Dmochowski JP; Guleyupoglu B; Bikson M; Fregni F
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():280-7. PubMed ID: 23041337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.
Datta A; Bikson M; Fregni F
Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1268-78. PubMed ID: 20435146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of the electric field components of tDCS via anisotropically conductive gyri-specific finite element head models.
Metwally MK; Cho YS; Park HJ; Kim TS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5514-7. PubMed ID: 23367178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-layer skull approximations perform well in transcranial direct current stimulation modeling.
Rampersad SM; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 May; 21(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 22855232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose.
Datta A; Zhou X; Su Y; Parra LC; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2013 Jun; 10(3):036018. PubMed ID: 23649036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation.
Bikson M; Rahman A; Datta A
Clin EEG Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 43(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 22956646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.
Wagner S; Rampersad SM; Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Oostendorp TF; Neuling T; Herrmann CS; Stegeman DF; Wolters CH
J Neural Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24310982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial direct current stimulation changes resting state functional connectivity: A large-scale brain network modeling study.
Kunze T; Hunold A; Haueisen J; Jirsa V; Spiegler A
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():174-87. PubMed ID: 26883068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiscale coupling of transcranial direct current stimulation to neuron electrodynamics: modeling the influence of the transcranial electric field on neuronal depolarization.
Dougherty ET; Turner JC; Vogel F
Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():360179. PubMed ID: 25404950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition.
Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
Clin EEG Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 43(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 22956647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The electric field induced in the brain by magnetic stimulation: a 3-D finite-element analysis of the effect of tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy.
Miranda PC; Hallett M; Basser PJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 50(9):1074-85. PubMed ID: 12943275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
