These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19964234)

  • 21. Theoretical investigation of transcranial alternating current stimulation using realistic head model.
    Manoli Z; Grossman N; Samaras T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4156-9. PubMed ID: 23366843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of tissue dielectric properties on the electric field induced in tDCS: a sensitivity analysis.
    Salvador R; Ramirez F; V'yacheslavovna M; Miranda PC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():787-90. PubMed ID: 23366010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Theoretical investigation of transcranial alternating current stimulation using laminar model.
    Lopes S; Davies N; Toumazou C; Grossman N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4152-5. PubMed ID: 23366842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. EEG human head modelling based on heterogeneous tissue conductivity.
    Wen P; Li Y
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Sep; 29(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 17058584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: physics, electrophysiology, and applications.
    Fatemi-Ardekani A
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2008; 36(5-6):375-412. PubMed ID: 20092430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 3D realistic head model simulation based on transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Yang S; Xu G; Wang L; Chen Y; Wu H; Li Y; Yang Q
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; Suppl():6469-72. PubMed ID: 17959428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Opitz A; Paulus W; Will S; Antunes A; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 109():140-50. PubMed ID: 25613437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physics of effects of transcranial brain stimulation.
    Miranda PC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2013; 116():353-66. PubMed ID: 24112908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Finite Element study of skin and fat delineation in an obese subject for transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Truong DQ; Magerowski G; Pascual-Leone A; Alonso-Alonso M; Bikson M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6587-90. PubMed ID: 23367439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation.
    Krieg TD; Salinas FS; Narayana S; Fox PT; Mogul DJ
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046014. PubMed ID: 26052136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of white matter anisotropy in modeling electroconvulsive therapy.
    Bai S; Loo C; Geng G; Dokos S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5492-5. PubMed ID: 22255581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
    Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy.
    Kasinadhuni AK; Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schär M; Mareci TH; Sadleir RJ
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):764-772. PubMed ID: 28457836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.
    Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schwartz B; Sadleir RJ
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066006. PubMed ID: 27705955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modeling the electric field induced in a high resolution realistic head model during transcranial current stimulation.
    Salvador R; Mekonnen A; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2073-6. PubMed ID: 21095946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.
    Rampersad SM; Janssen AM; Lucka F; Aydin Ü; Lanfer B; Lew S; Wolters CH; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 24760939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Brain-behavior relations: transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review.
    Rossini PM; Rossini L; Ferreri F
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2010; 29(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 20176526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.